Officer Corps of US Military Complicit In Treason & Establishment of NWO

Officer Corps of the US Military Complicit in Treason & Establishment of World Government : Freedom Outpost
.
The above link at the very least deserves a read, an assessment, discussion, and serious comment among all of us are even vaguely considered by themselves and others as the 3%ers of this Constitutional Republic. jmho, Tacmotusn below is the first of the exerpts of this linked report.
.
This report is indisputable proof that high treason and the plan for the establishment of world government under a "New Order of Nations" are being brought about by the efforts of domestic enemies among the commissioned ranks within our own military. It is also proof that the plan has been greatly delayed.
.
"It is inconceivable that those with power and wealth would not band together with a common bond, a common interest, and a long-range plan to decide and direct the future of the world."
― Milton William Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse, (Light Technology Publishing, December 1, 1991), Introduction, p. 2
.
This is an extension of my earlier article from October 30, 2013, entitled Treason: The Disarmament of the United States, and the Declaration of World Government.

A 134-page unclassified book, published in January 1992 by the United States Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, details a revision of an earlier plan that had projected world government to be in effect by the target year of 2000. The report is called A World 2010: A New Order of Nations. The efforts to cement world government by the year 2000 were significantly set back by the work of American patriotic organizations, the formation of constitutional unorganized state militias, and most importantly, the elite's inability to disarm the American people.

.
The plan is taught in the War College and in all of the U.S. military academies, as the answer to war. They could not be doing what they're doing in Washington, D.C. ― they could not be placing American troops under United Nations or NATO command; they could not be subverting the Constitution for the united States of America, which all officers and enlisted men are sworn to protect and defend against all enemies foreign and domestic ― if the highest ranking officers in all five branches of our military services were not complicit in this plan. It is all to hasten the promulgation of world government under a global economic and sociopolitical power monopoly of the State.
.
None of this is being brought about by accident, but by strategic long-term planning, by carefully manipulating and propagandizing the populations of the world. And the Officer Corps of the United States military is deeply involved.
A World 2010 describes a world where the influence of the super-power of the 20th century is greatly diminished, and where the government of the nation has collapsed and reorganized into several new national entities. It also portrays a world where 20th century third world nations achieve a new status in the world's family of nations, where new international status and alignments lead to a New World Order.
The new order places the nations of the world in 2010 into five groups according to their relationship to modernization and industrialization under a centralized system of global authority.

The following are notable excerpts from the Report Documentation Page of the book:
.
On line item 13a, it labels the type of this report as "Forecast," denoting the prediction or at least an estimation of a future event or trend:

On line item 13b, it illustrates that the time covered for this report is between the years 1992 to 2010, denoting at present that this time frame for completion was not realized:

The subject terms on the same page are listed as: "Future, forecast, international order, devolution of power, postindustrial," indicating that a postindustrial society in the target nation is essential to the completion of the forecast:


The Abstract in line item 19 gives a brief but concise synopsis of the plan:


So you see the redistribution of wealth straight out of the Communist Manifesto playbook, and the Hegelian Dialectic playing out in that the Soviet Union had to collapse ― or at least the people had to perceive that it did (see The Perestroika Deception by Col. Anatoliy Golitsyn) ― in order to usher in the new era of peace.

However, what does "peace" truly mean to the people trying to bring it about? Karl Marx, the man who gave structure to the modern socialist philosophy, defined the meaning of peace according to the religion of the Marxist ideology:
"The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."
Now you know exactly what the U.N. "peace keepers" are for and what "world peace" truly means to these people. The "peace keepers" are occupation forces for the enforcement of world totalitarian socialist government, and the world army formed for the destruction of any and all opposition to its completion. State Department Memorandum 7277 and Public Law 87-297 codify this.

You have to understand that the terms used by these people are almost always a metaphor with an esoteric (hidden) meaning embedded within the outward meaning. I this case, "peace" means the absolute suppression of opposition to the desired political ideology.

Going further into detail, here is the entire text of the Foreword of A World 2010 on page v, written by Major General William A. Stofft, U.S. Army Commandant:
This book is a description of a plausible future world environment for the years around 2010. This environment describes a world where the influence of one superpower of the 20th century is diminished and where the government and the nation of the other has collapsed and reorganized into several new national entities. It also portrays a world where 20th century Third World nations achieve a new status in the world's family of nations. The author depicts in this book a world where new international status and alignments lead to a new world order of nations. The new order places the nations of the world in 2010 in five groups according to their relationship to modernization and industrialization.
The author created the concepts for A World 2010 and its forecasts in 1984. The narrative was published in an Army document in 1986 entitled, A World 2010: A Decline of Superpower Influence. The concepts for this world were based on the author's interpretation of basic trends existing during the last half of the 20th century. These trends have a high probability of enduring through the year 2010, as well as shaping the world environment well into the 21 st century. The 2010 environment focused on a devolution of world power and a new order of nations. The author perceived a world where new democratic governments and free-market economies of nations, including the East European nations and the Soviet Union, were developing and competing for power and world markets. The author described a world of increasing nuclear disarmament and a down-sized, CONUS-stationed military force. The concepts were sound, the forecasts were valid, but the time of the occurrence of many events was 20 years earlier than 2010. The forecasts did not anticipate an above normal Soviet rate of change effected by the former Soviet leader, Gorbachev, and the Russian leader, Yeltsin, in the 1990s. The author believed that because of these changes it was time to update the forecasts of the world in 2010. The concepts in the 1991 forecasts have been advanced to emphasize a new order of nations and to examine its impact on the national security of th. United States.
The author wrote this book for the Strategic Studies Institute. United States Army War College, as a contribution to long-range strategic futures and planning. The book and the forecasts, inferences, and any conclusions it contains were designed by the author to be a basis for the development of alternative future world scenarios for strategic planning by the Department of Defense and other government agencies.
The perception of developing new democratic governments is a key giveaway. Democracy is the code word for socialism, and it was revolutionary political theorist Vladimir Lenin, leader of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, who said:

"Democracy is indispensable to socialism."
Also, the forecast of "long-range strategic futures and planning" confirms the conspiratorial view of history. These types of plans are not organic, and are not a product of the accidental view of the way the world works. They are conceived, planned, analyzed, streamlined, allocated for, funded, manned, and carried out.

This is a list of the contents as it appears in the report:

CHAPTER 1: Background and Process
CHAPTER 2: World International Order
CHAPTER 3: World Population
CHAPTER 4: World Interdependence and Sociopolitical Change
CHAPTER 5: World Energy. Science, Technology, and Space Exploration
CHAPTER 6: World Military Status
CHAPTER 7: National Challenges
CHAPTER 8: The Impact of the New Order
CHAPTER 9: U.S. Military Forces
All of this makes a case that our Officer Corps of the United States military is a captured operation at the highest levels of the command structure. If you were sitting on the jury, how would you find the defendant?
Here is the description of the U.S. Army War College from its official website:

​

 

I am glad you dug this up it is what is before us if we don't change what and who is in power. Must re-post this every day to remind us all of what needs to happen and I don't know re-post it myself....

 

German officer to serve as U.S. Army Europe's chief of staff | Army Times | armytimes.com

 

While this book may be on the reading list... unless the individual has actually gone through war college/command and staff... and can personally verify this I think that it is the equal to an op-ed piece .... As a Former officer I'm somewhat offended.... but YMMV... everyone is entitled to their opinion....

 

Now tell how you really feel!!
That explains the 'Will you fire on American Citizens" litmus test!

 

Witch Doctor, I can understand you being offended, but I have a couple of questions. How high in the officer ranks did you go? I don't think any officer O-5, maybe even O-6 and below would be complicit to any great degree in any of this. Secondly Junior officer or Senior officer, the Oath you took upon Commissioning or Enlistment had that same phrase in there I swore to, to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign or domestic. Does that mean anything to you or is it just a minor thing to you? Who does this post make you offended at? If at me, it is misdirected. My first post on this was the tip of the iceberg of the information provided by the link at the top of the post. I am pissed at the Top Brass and Elitist Political A-hole promoting this agenda as well as the news hacks totally blind to or complicit with this crap as well.
.
First and foremost to me is the "Law of the Land" and the "Rule of Law". Everything else is lessor ..... well there is God, My Country, the 10 Commandments, personal Honor, Ethics, and Respect for oneself and others under the Golden Rule. I believe in Sovereignty of the Nation and the individual. Anything to do with the NWO is alien and abhorrent to me. I am not convinced that an end to War on either a Religious or Political Basis is possible. The human race is flawed and always has been since Adam and Eve were cast out of the Garden of Eden. Additionally I will never believe that Islam is a religion or Peace. To do so is ignorant or stupid, or insane. That's how I really feel.

as to your quote above, it seems you did not click on the link and read the entire article. There are senior officers attesting to the facts laid out in this article who have gone through war college/command and staff. If you don't read the article and only take stock of the brief first excerpts I posted I have no doubt YMMV.

 

During Hurricane Katrina there were many cases, Well Documented Cases, of the military disarming the public, with no concern to whether or not it was Constitutional, they were simply ordered to do it and they did.
An argument can be made that there was an emergency situation going on, but that makes it even worse when you consider that Anarchy was the rule of law and the MANY Police officers were in on the Mayhem and Looting. This gave the common Law Abiding citizen no way to protect themselves, either against the Looters and Criminals or the Corrupt People who were supposed to be Peace Officers!
'Oath Keepers' Chief Points To Katrina Reponse To Justify Paranoia: 'They Disarmed Americans Over Some Bad Weather' | Crooks and Liars
New Orleans probes police role in looting - US news - Katrina, The Long Road Back | NBC News
Why did so many members of the New Orleans Police Department and nearby agencies desert during Katrina?
JUST SAY'IN!

 

I read the entire link, including all excerpts and foreword included from the book in question; and I do not immediately draw the same conclusions as the author of this article.

The author seems bent on grasping onto every word and inference which could in any way support his argument. He has mashed bits and pieces of this book, and the use of this book by the War College, along with a dizzying array of unrelated facts and quotes (unrelated except by him), into his pet theory. He is a hammer in search of a nail. It seems like three deep breaths and a cold beer would benefit the author immensely.

The book, as I understand it, describes a possible future, where a new order of nations and international influence exists in the world. We in fact had a new order of nations, after the Arab Spring uprisings. We had another change to the "world order" as an unintended consequence of American actions in Iraq combined with the Syrian uprising - in the creation of ISIS. We are watching possibly another new "world order" morphing into being as the activities in the Ukraine play themselves out, and the bi-polar world of the Cold War begins to threaten a return. At least every decade, we see a new world order.

This author seems to sleep with "Agenda 21 - New World Order" tattooed to the insides of his eyelids, and awakens only to pounce upon anything that advances his near paranoid clarion call. The unfortunate use of the words "new" "world" and "order," though not in that order or arrangement, by the author of "A World 2010 - A New Order of Nations," seems to have attracted his attention.

His claim that the "Officer Corps of the US Military" is complicit in treason, based on his interpretation of the use of this book by the War College, is absurd and should be insulting to all veterans. Yes, politics exist within the military, and the higher up the rungs of the military rank structure one goes, the more politics that one has to deal with; and frankly, you don't have to go very high up to start encountering it. BUT it is up to the individual officer or SNCO/CPO to choose to either wade through the sewage of politics with grim determination, or to stoop down and take a corrupting drink of it. Most are able to refrain from taking that drink. In his blanket smear of the "Officer Corps of the US Military," this author, as a veteran, is no better than those who took that drink. He just waited until he pulled off his uniform to imbibe.

I hope the attendees of our War College continue to read books, construct thought experiments, and consider alternative future "world orders" because fighting the next war with the tactics of the last war is a good way to lose. "What if" should not be a dirty word, particularly at an institution of learning.