Hard to say if anybody would get injured from a projectile not coming from a high velocity rifle after it has gone through the target. For all we know, it could be a pistol carbine that caused this, we don't know for certain. Also, the trajectory would be from behind at an angle, not sure how steep. After the projectile enters it could have easily turned and had an unpredictable exit. At one frame it does look like a bullet coming from the rear. Again, for all we know, this could have been a firearm made to look like an ordinary item like a microphone. Damn. This is just...damn. And the RFK assassination was also shrouded the same way. If this is real, then it's like they are using their hallmark and just bragging about it. And if the FBI doesn't remark about this, man. They would have an entry and exit wound. This is all they would need to be on the right track. And that guy on the roof would be a very useful patsy, hell he could have actually never had a rifle up there at all and just imagined he had one. Damn.
I think in the end ballistics won't matter, but motive. If the truth comes out. Something tells me maybe his own team was behind it.
I once shot a large 200lb buck in the neck at 40 yards with a 150 grain ballistic tip out of a .308 No exit as the bullet hit the neck vertebrae, Not much blood, But he went stiff as a board for a few seconds for what this is worth?
If Robinson didn't make the kill shot then with two shooters there would have been two shot. There is virtually no way they would have happened at the same time, but there is only the noise of one shot. We know Robinson took a shot because there is no way he would have missed the recoil of a 30-06. The videos are consistent with Robinson's shot. The entry wound is big because it hit the body armor and almost certainly deformed and tumbled on impact. I'm open minded if more facts come forth, but right now everything fits a single shooter that being Robinson.
I tend to agree. However, I've got to reconcile this latest information, too. There is a number of possibilities that can happen to permit any of these scenarios, but we have to try to use every tool available to us. First, there may have only been one shooter, from the rear. The sound of the gunshot could have been from anywhere. The real shot could have been silenced. The other shot could have been from another person just making the required sound (shooting up into the sky for example). Or the real shot could be the only sound made, and this would require the rooftop to be inconsequential. Now, all of this requires the original version to be false. We never witnessed a rifle on a roof, it was "found in the woods" fully assembled. The shooter still hasn't given statements I have seen. We see snippets of choice Discord chats, none of it timestamped or in its unadulterated form. Then we can get into the tertiary areas of this with possible mind control and Mossad involvement. I mean, Mossad can go anywhere, they can break into a fully locked and secure room and assassinate somebody and leave and somehow lock the door behind them and stump the CIA (true story). Nothing is off the table. But, I will say the more we stray away from the official narrative, the stranger it gets. But again, we're dealing with (very possible anyway) the Mossad assassin squad utilizing a patsy theory. And to the Kirk family and all those out there still reeling over this, I don't even want to go into full theory land right now. I can only say that looking at the limited video I've seen, something is off. A few things are off, actually. And it shouldn't be this way if it's like the FBI and media is reporting it. The physics are funky, the ballistics doesn't make sense. The video linked earlier shows how wearing a mic like Charlie was wearing could give the impression of wearing armor. The shirt would move very much in this manner, at least it's possible. Yeah, but if we take the official version, a 30-06 round from that range wouldn't get lodged, it would have enough force to blast clean through. But, a smaller caliber from behind might leave the type of exit wound in the front of the neck like we see, and that's more consistent with the ballistics from the video. I don't know. There's a lot to digest, and maybe we will get more answers with time. But that one guy yelling and distracting police, the one they initially grabbed...that was a convenient distraction. Enough to get anybody nearby who may have actually shot him to move away freely.
If he was going to be caught it was going to be while he was still on campus, so he would want a functioning firearm as soon as possible. Me, I would have carried a handgun as well.
It seems that pressure from corporations that have tested the winds have led to the firings of many. Best part. They made this decision on their own. They were not threatened by shareholders, or sponsors or any outside group. These decisions came quickly and decisively. They thought "What a SICK BITCH!!" and fired her on the spot.
What was it , 60 yrs before JFK's murder was ,, exposed ,,, This might be JFK 2.0 ,,, Either way ,,, there's a good man gone ,,,
Except you see the impact of the bullet on his plate before it flies up into his neck. I thought they had also said the recovered bullet fragments inside his skull. Like theh came up from below hit neck through chin and lodged in there.