I was listening to Guntalk on Sunday when this happened. Tricky bastards trying to hide their plans after people flooded the site. http://www.guntalk.com/site.php?pageID=15&newsID=55 Obama's Plan for Your Guns Yesterday on Gun Talk, Tom exposed the Obama Transition Team's plan regarding guns. On change.gov, Obama's website, they spelled out their plan to reinstate permanently the expired "Assault Weapons Ban" and more. You listened, flooded the site and before the show was over they took down this page, hiding the true agenda for your gun rights. Well, once again, we have to expose this. The thing about the internet is, it's there forever, archived. We've found the page they took down...Click Here to view (scroll down to the "Crime and Law Enforcement" section). Go take a look at what they don't want you to know. <!-- ISEARCH_END_INDEX --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=540 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=347> </TD><TD vAlign=top width=185></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Roll the presses at treasury. No other way to fund all that. And buy rice, lots of it, that's all you'll be able to afford.
The one thing they always refuse to acknowledge is the fact that in a battle against "Domestic enemies" them , our streets WILL once again become battlefields just as they did in the Revolution to gain our freedom from the tyrannical government lead by King George of England . This is the whole reason we have a Second Amendment in the first place as such even the 2A asserts there is absolutely nothing "Common sense" in such a restriction on the Right to keep and Bear Military arms . If we had a honest court system about the closest thing to the laws they Claim they want passed would be ones that require stronger punishment in cases where unsupervised children are shot with firearms and these would of course apply only to the custodial parent/s of the so called children involved in such things . Even these would require some serious changes in their definition of "Children" as they often use the term for 17-20 YO gang members killed in their tribal feuds and the Founders would dismiss such nonsense . Of course all of this would also demand a change back to placing Real responsibility on the parents which is a major shift from the present "Nanny State" and stop blaming everyone and thing that a true use of common sense would prove are blameless in such cases such as gun dealers and makers . Something they would never allow .
It's gone from google, file not listed. We have internet suppresion, for sure, some thing I noticed when Barry started running. It will pop up again. The line in the sand is being drafted.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/q-4jqZSEo0Q&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/q-4jqZSEo0Q&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
I think Mr. Obama needs to read that damned piece of paper, as Bush-lite so lovingly referred to it. It is past time to "Zumbo" these wanna-be dictators. The Federal Gov is not permitted to supersede State. They need to go back to school and pay some attention to "Civics" class. I'll bet even money that niether Mr. Obama or Ms Pelosi understand the difference between a democracy and a Republic; Maybe its time we explained it to them.
If Barry uh-uh tries to go any further down the road he is on, that lesson might just come about. I can't see many sheep putting up with much more.
Amen to that brother, Amen. Us monkeys and our fellow law abiding gun owners in this country have a right to "survive" with our guns and ammo still in our possession - not the Gov.'s possession. And I agree, just because the Federal level says to do one thing, doesn't mean that the State has to agree with or do it. I hope this brings some states to secede from the union. That might wake up Washington.
The great "Chewbak Osama" and all his chronies (past and future) cant do me much worse than my state legistature already has....in mean I live in "Nazi-chussets" and lemme tell ya.......a slingshot will put you in jail. None of my friends hunt anymore. Its not worth the potential risks.
Hmmm.... the last time a few free-thinking States had a tiff with Washington, Mr. Lincoln prosecuted his unpopular and illegar little War. Made a right mess of The Olde South.... BUT.... now those states have many more guns..... And many very well-equipped bases. Be a different kettle of beans next time around, methinks. I could easily see this nation, long too danged big to serve ALL citizens needs equitably, deviding into three or four sovereign countries. DC sure would not like it, and no doubt would get their frilly panties in a wad over the temerity of those 'lesser people' breaking away - but even the Great Oppressor, Mr. Lincoln, had earlier said we had that right. It's high time We The People exercised that right. I for one refuse to live my life under Chicago Law.....