criminalizing dissent (NDAA)

Discussion in 'Freedom and Liberty' started by CATO, Aug 15, 2012.


  1. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

    Pretty scary stuff...

    http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/10861-criminalizing-dissent
     
  2. ghrit

    ghrit Bad company Administrator Founding Member

    In a way, this approaches tin foil hat material. Since the link covers some facts on the current status of Section 1021 of the NDAA, it makes sense to read it. The argument is real, the quoted section is editorial.
     
    TheEconomist likes this.
  3. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

    feel free to move there....:oops:
     
  4. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/16/homeland-battlefield-act-unconstitutional_n_1522587.html

     
  5. ghrit

    ghrit Bad company Administrator Founding Member

    Not yet, the legal discussion in the link has facts rather than speculation. Works for me. If it was strictly unsupported speculation and grey sky thinking, it would already be moved.
     
  6. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

    I figured since the author was the one who brought the law-suit, it was more than speculation.
     
  7. CaboWabo5150

    CaboWabo5150 Hell's coming with me

    TwoCrows likes this.
  8. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

    tulianr, Brokor and ghrit like this.
  9. Brokor

    Brokor Live Free or Cry Moderator Site Supporter+++ Founding Member

    gitmo_usflag.

    This image says it all. Most days, it seems like all we are doing is staving-off the inevitable.
     
    VisuTrac likes this.
  10. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

  11. ghrit

    ghrit Bad company Administrator Founding Member

    (obscenity)
     
    BTPost likes this.
  12. BTPost

    BTPost Stumpy Old Fart,Deadman Walking, Snow Monkey Moderator

    THEY can ALWAYS find a Bleeding Heart Federal Appeals Judge, to do whatever THEY want.... but the three Judge Appeals Panel that will actually Hear the Appellate Case, will decide, the case, on the LAW.
     
  13. oldawg

    oldawg Monkey+++

    +1
     
  14. JABECmfg

    JABECmfg multi-useless

    From the article linked to in post #10:

    The stay will remain in effect until at least September 28, when a three-judge appeals court panel is expected to begin addressing the issue.

    Has anyone heard any updates on this yet?
     
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary
17282WuJHksJ9798f34razfKbPATqTq9E7