2:12to 2:20 is especially poignant., http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1205727731.php 2:12-2:20 is good <!-- startprint --> <table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr> <td align="center"><center> [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=+2]Flashback: A Good Laugh at Art Laffer's CNBC's Discussion with Peter Schiff [video][/SIZE][/FONT] </center> </td> </tr> </tbody></table> [FONT=Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif] [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]-- Posted Sunday, 16 March 2008 | Digg This Article[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] | Source: GoldSeek.com[/FONT] [/FONT] [FONT=Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, Serif]Arthur Laffer [Laffer Investments] debates Peter Schiff on CNBC, August 28, 2006 allowing history to judge who was really off base. We would like to know why CNBC continues to provide Mr. Arthur Laffer prime exposure while Mr. Peter Schiff has not been invited back since late 2007? [/FONT][/FONT]
Thank you Tango, that was my first exposure to Mr. Peter Schiff and the man makes sense. if we had a great deal more like him, we might not be in this mess.
