Nepal's parliament set on fire after PM resigns over anti-corruption protests - BBC News Nepal Violence: Gen Z protesters set Kantipur TV headquarters Wife of Ex-Nepali PM Burned Alive, Gen Z Revolt Engulfs Country: Live Updates - Newsweek Gett'n serious in Nepal, a place not normall associated with this level of violence.
Hrm...demonstrations carried out primarily by college students and "Gen Z" young people. If it's anything like, oh every other nation on the planet, those would primarily be radicals of one type of variety. We shouldn't have trouble finding out where the funding is coming from to organize and strategize these uprisings. Also, as usual, the "media" reported on the massive disparity between the working class and the political elites in Nepal, which suffers from *gasp* who would have guessed, economic troubles and job shortages. If anybody is having trouble here, think about CIA global operations and Zionist -I mean, Communist tactics. And all of this in a country which is at least 80 percent Hindu. The next largest group would be Buddhist and then followed closely by the dreaded Islamic types. It's the same script, over and over again.
In my opinion over population is causing abhorrent behavior in humans Classic experiment The phenomenon of "strange behavior" in rats due to overpopulation is a central theme of the mid-20th-century studies conducted by ethologist John B. Calhoun . His "mouse utopia" experiments created ideal environments for rodents, which eventually devolved into social and behavioral collapse as the population grew excessively dense. The bizarre and destructive behaviors that emerged were described by Calhoun as a "behavioral sink". The "behavioral sink" experiments Calhoun's experiments, which took place over decades starting in the 1940s, were designed to study the effects of overcrowding in rodents. In his most famous experiment, Universe 25, he placed several pairs of mice in a 9-square-foot enclosure with unlimited food, water, and nesting materials, but finite space. The population initially thrived, but as it approached its peak, the social fabric of the colony began to break down. This led to a range of highly abnormal behaviors.
Nepal is in an interesting spot being nestled between India and China. I wonder which is encouraging the demonstrations? I wonder which will ride to the rescue?
Maybe China causing trouble hoping to come to the rescue and then never leave?! India would never stand for that though. Plus, the leaders of India, China, Russia and North Korea were all making nice the other day.
I've seen video and read about these experiments, very interesting but not promising for the world's future. I've often thought about this, the world's population 100 years ago in 1925 wasn't quite 2 billion and we are currently 8+ billion. The UN expects the population growth to slow to a growth of '1.9 billion between now and 2100 (from 8.2 billion to 10.2 billion).' However, when has the UN ever got anything correct...much like our own government. My personal belief is that population is the root cause of most of humanity problems. I also think the globalists will attempt at some point to cull a major portion of the world to ensure a more peaceful and prosperous world. Their mass immigration experiment worked about as well as throwing gas on fire - yet - the Covid pandemic was a success and gave loads of good data so... I think it's their next logical move. How do they justify it? For the good of the world, of course, ' All roads to hell are paved with good intentions.' I know, sounds whacko and Bandit has gone around the twist which is probably true... @duane recently posted about the rise in mental illness and its ties to crime. Consider the densely population major cities of the world and their crime rate and how it relates to the Calhoun experiments. No big brain needed here. Granted, people are not mice so the results will be different, some better, some worse but the overall conclusion remains the same, dense population destroys society. This means with population growth must come harsher crime laws which means more government control, less freedom. No harsher laws and crime will continue to rise until the people beg for stricter laws, beg for the government to do more, which they will. However, the alternative, is much more palatable. Lower populations by a factor of 2 or 3, less crime, more space per individual, more opportunity, happier society, less resources being consumed and with AI and robotics more resources available per person. Sometimes, I believe the Democrats want exactly this, crime to rise to a point that the people beg for harsher laws, for more government control and afterwards, the Globalists who are more pragmatic, will start the road to the 'final solution,' so to speak, by lowering the population. EDIT: They wouldn't do such a thing? Watch 'Ordinary Men' which is on Netflix. Watch and listen carefully then ask yourself again.
