Current State of Education in America

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by NY PRO, Oct 8, 2006.


  1. NY PRO

    NY PRO Monkey+++

    +1 what Clyde and 155 did(homeschool).


    There shouldn't be any armed teachers because there shouldn't be any public schools. They're all failing no matter how much money we throw at them. They can't keep kids safe because the gov't can never keep anyone or anything safe. Shame on us for even thinking that it can. Nor can they teach basic skills either.

    I'm sure there'll be more meetings , more feel good committes and more taxes collected for "the children" and the prisons/schools will be even more "secure" with even more cameras and socialist indoctrination programs to go with all the new measures.

    Then they'll shoot them where there's no security.......on the school buses!!! Then they'll need armored cars to pick up your kids and armed escorts to guard the school buses. Guards to guard the guards after they beat up or molest your kids while they're guarding them!! (or sell them drugs!)


    Of course now with all the new measures your children will be easy pickens for all the sexual predator teachers that are out there now days. And the schools will be so secure....that you won't be able to get to your kids when they're getting raped!! See.....now don't you feel safer?


    We get the gov't we deserve.....facism/socialism.....when we fail to take care of ourselves and expect gov't to do it all! Our founding fathers would be laughing in our faces for the path we've gone down!
     
  2. RightHand

    RightHand Pioneer in a New World Moderator Founding Member

    I wish I could see the world in black and white you many of you do. I wish we all had the options of homeschooling or private schools. But, my friends, the world is neither black and white and many of us do not have the luxury of those options. So, to the best of our ability, we have to participate in the decision making of our elected officials so that we do get the government we expect and deserve and that our children get the best possible education under the safest conditions we can provide.
     
  3. Clyde

    Clyde Jet Set Tourer Administrator Founding Member

    Righthand,

    You are so correct that it is not black and white. Too many people have had the bite of the government apple and they are not going back. What I have noticed in the public shools around me is the standards have simply been lowered to make the kids "pass" the state tests. My nephews passed with a 49% from 4th to 5th grade...neither new their multiplication tables, proper punctuation (capital letters start a sentence, etc), and their hand writing might have been chinese because you couldn't read it.

    Now, I don't place total blame on the school, but place the biggest blame on my sister who participated so little in their education that she didn't even know they hadn't turned in homework for two years....she was simply relying on the .gov to do it all. That is where the big mistake comes in with government programs. People find a convenient way to point the finger at someone other than themselves because it is being provided...almost free!

    So, as these boys are behind and will most likely remain 2 years behind their peers, I have a skewed vision of all progams like "public education".

    Sorry on the subtle hijack, but the security from all aspects of home schooling is more than enough in this f'd up world of sexual predators, sexual teachers, gun-toting idiots who make all gun owners look bad.
     
  4. RightHand

    RightHand Pioneer in a New World Moderator Founding Member

    I was fortunate enough to have a very good education, a very desciplined education. The descipline began at home and extended into the school. The question I was asked by my parents was not what had the teacher done wrong, but rather but had I done wrong. I truly believe that a lack of descipline and model of personal responsibility from the parents is one of the main reasons for the current failure in education. Parents are abdicating their responsibility to others - the schools - the Boy and Girl Scouts - the Church, the Government - you name it.

    Consider that the children who grew up in the 70s and 80s, when permissiveness began to become rampant in many homes around the country, are now the very people who are standing in front of our children teaching and functioning as school administrators.

    I don't have a lot of hope for the children being educated in most of todays school school systems but I am hopeful that if descipline and strong (not just loving but firm) parenting returns to our culture, the generation to follow will be will benefit.
     
  5. NY PRO

    NY PRO Monkey+++

    Children aren't educated today....they are indoctrinated! Too bad most parents have been brain washed into believing that they actually get an education.

    Public schools have no incentive to succeed. They have to answer to no one....especially now that all schools are run by the Federal gov't after they took the "Kings coin". Before compulsory public education was imposed upon US, there was private tutoring or homeschooling. Our founding fathers did quite well with this as you can see from their writings and accomplishments. College students today don't even meet the founder's standards or even most foreign school standards which is why we're collapsing and they're rising.


    The good thing about home schoolers is they'll be up to speed when the foreigners come here to take over. The rest of the so called educated idiots will be servants to their new masters!


    But we can all feel warm and fuzzy, because "It was for the Children".
     
  6. RightHand

    RightHand Pioneer in a New World Moderator Founding Member

    Just because the children of "the affluent" founding fathers were educated at home does not mean that they were well educated. In addition, the majority of the citizens of our country when it was new, did not come from families of financial means. Most of the children educated in that period of our history were functional but not well educated. Even moving into the 19th and 20th centuries, children were educated only to the level required by their station in life and very rarely beyond. the children instead, were expected to contribute to the income or living standard of the family. Children married in their teens and began raising their own families. Public education was an enormous social change but it was the first opportunity for many to see their children better educated then themselves.

    Now, the clock is running backwards. We see our own children with less of a grasp of math, science, history, and english than most of us had at similar ages. I won't even address the issue of penmenship because it is no longer taught. We have several young guys in the shop part time, all college students, and I cannot read their handwriting and they need a calculator to add and subtract.

    I want our children to have the opportunity to join others in a classroom, to learn to deal with the differences they will encounter for the remainder of their lives and to participate in the social life but first, I want them to be educated. I want them to learn a sense of curiosity about the world beyond their small borders so that they will be life long students, not just class attendees for 12 or 16 years.
     
  7. E.L.

    E.L. Moderator of Lead Moderator Emeritus Founding Member

    You both make a lot of points. My wife is a public school teacher and she sees it every day. The problem usually lies with the parents, not the school. If you don't agree with the ciriculum, every parent has a right to protest, to the the education board, to the school, etc. You also have the right to educate your children about the things that you do not agree with (The War of Northern Aggression for example). When parents do not care enough to be part of the education process the Gov. will do what they do. There are a lot of really good teachers out there, but when they cannot discipline the kids that need it (the children that need corporal punishment the most are the ones who's parent will refuse to sign the slip, we see it every year) and the parents do nothing to help, the system stumbles along. There are however lots of good things about public education, especially in the right school districts. Opportunities for a different classes, extracirricular activities such as sports, band, clubs such as the Key Club which is all about vollunteer work they teach team work, self discipline, character development, hard work and probably most important the ability to deal with their peers and manage relationships. Irregardless you have to be part of your children's education because we don't want a village raising our children, despite Hillary's beliefs.
     
  8. RightHand

    RightHand Pioneer in a New World Moderator Founding Member

    I, too, see many teachers who offer more than babysitting. They actual inspire the kids to learn which is, in reality, what teaching is all about. I am more unsettled by the general system which continues to accomodate mediocre teachers, unruly and disrespectful children, uninvolved parents, and communities which tolerate it all without demanding value in education.

    I consider it fortunate that my grandchildren are in a school which offers them many wonderful learning opportunities. The rest if up to them...and their family to follow through at home raising responsible citizens.
     
  9. RightHand

    RightHand Pioneer in a New World Moderator Founding Member

    Since we seemed to we having a discussion of education in general (I admit to being the hijacking culprit) I decided to move this from the Poll thread on "Should Teachers be Armed" to its own thread
     
  10. Clyde

    Clyde Jet Set Tourer Administrator Founding Member

    Righthand,

    I think your point on overall discipline in the classroom is the crux the majority of the educational deterioration. Discipline starts at home and most parents don't discipline their children by our grandparents standards. They take the easy way out and do little. I know I am making a big generalization by "most" but that I what I have seen in my neighborhood.

    Without discipline, a teacher has to spend his/her time controlling a clas of 20-30 unruly rugrats vs. actually teaching. If the teacher does anything that appears like discipline, the parents get mad because "johnny" is a good kid when they are around. I heard a story about a male teacher in a middle school who disciplined a kid (not by force) infront of the entire class and basically made him look like a dunce for the way he was acting. The kid's father came to school the next morning, pinned him against the wall by his short and said if he ever made his child feel that way again, he would sue the teacher........Look in the mirror daddy, you created a monster.
     
  11. Quigley_Sharps

    Quigley_Sharps The Badministrator Administrator Founding Member

    I think there still is hope in rural schools; we are fortunate enough too still have a good school system.
    The way our children act in school is directly from the way their parents raised them.
    I got more spankings from the neighborhood mothers than my own for doing wrong!
    If you raise a shit head and guess what they get in the school system because of it. Gasp! a shit head.
    My daughter is working on high school credits and is in the 8th grade. She holds a 4.0 and does this easily.
    We keep her challenged at home with computer school programs advanced ahead of what she doing; it really helps her and prepares her for the school.
    And really enjoys it, school and the home schooling.
    There is no way in Hell I would raise my Children in a big City for no amount of money!
     
  12. Clyde

    Clyde Jet Set Tourer Administrator Founding Member

    Quigs,

    That give makes me happy to know how well your daughter is doing. My daugher is 6 and getting ready to start 3rd grade math and 2nd grade english. My wife was an english and music major and is one of the most patient people I have ever met. My daughter simply works about 2 hours a day and the rest of the time she reads, practices the piano, and plays with her younger brother.

    The big city sucks. But for the metro-detroit market, I would have moved a long time ago; I am going to away for the next two weekends though.
     
  13. Tracy

    Tracy Insatiably Curious Moderator Founding Member

    Mine are studying nanotechnology as an "extra-curricular".
     
  14. Tracy

    Tracy Insatiably Curious Moderator Founding Member

    Well worth the time, Thank you!

    Interesting timing, as we were just talking about things covered in this article just last evening.

    ETA: I swear I posted this after SC's posting!
     
  15. melbo

    melbo Hunter Gatherer Administrator Founding Member

    Test for time stamp
     
  16. Seacowboys

    Seacowboys Senior Member Founding Member

    Long read, but worth it

    <hr align="center" color="#000000" noshade="noshade" size="1"> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="745" width="98%"><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3" valign="top"> <table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" width="130"> <tbody><tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> <td>
    </td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> <td>
    </td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> <td>
    </td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>[​IMG]</td> </tr> </tbody></table> [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    </td> <td align="left" bgcolor="#ffffff" height="755" valign="top" width="496">
    <center> </center>
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif][​IMG][/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The Subversion of Education in America: Lesson #1
    By Alan Caruba
    [/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]I’ll bet you think that the problems with our nation’s schools are a fairly recent phenomenon. Wrong. It dates backs to the 1960’s. Those that have implemented the subversion of our educational system have sought to fly well below the radar of public awareness, depending on stealth and duplicity to achieve the wreckage that has already stunted the lives of thousands who have passed through it.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif][​IMG][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]In this and three other commentaries, I will walk you through the history of the problem with the help of an extraordinary book, "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America" by Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt. The facts I will share with you are found in a fat compendium of research by this former senior official with the US Department of Education who discovered the mother lode, copied it, and fled. She is one of America’s unsung heroes.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]As Iserbyt points out, in the 1960’s "American education would henceforth concern itself with the importance of the group rather than with the importance of the individual." The purpose of education would shift to focus on the student’s emotional health, rather than academic learning. Remember the 1960’s? Sex, drugs and rock’n roll? Drop out, tune in, and turn on? Just about everything that is wrong with America today had its genesis in this pathetic decade of youthful self-indulgence."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]In 1965, there were two major federal initiatives developed with funding from The Elementary and Secondary Education Act passed that year. One was the 1965-1969 Behavioral Science Teacher Education Program and the other was the publication by the government of "Pacesetters in Innovation", a 584-page catalogue of behavior modification programs to be used by the schools.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Let me repeat that: a catalogue of behavior modification programs! We’re not talking of programs to teach students anything. We are talking about programs to indoctrinate children passing through the system to believe in values contrary to those on which this nation was based.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]In brief, the intention was to create a generation or two of Americans who would accept the United Nations, not the United States, as their new "nation", a global nation, one-world government. The last thing the conspirators wanted was a nation of individuals who could or would actually think for themselves. This is how we ended up with Bill Clinton, the classic student achiever of the 1960’s.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Iserbyt writes that, "In 1960, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s Convention Against Discrimination was signed in Paris. This convention laid the groundwork for control of American education—both public and private—by UN agencies and agents."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Now connect the dots. In 1960, "Soviet Education Programs: Foundations, Curriculums, Teacher Preparation" was published under the auspices of the US Department of Health, Education and Welfare. It was the blueprint for the US school-to-work restructuring that would take place and it would rely on the "Pavlovian conditioned reflex theory." The mastermind of mind control and conditioning was a psychologist, Dr. B.F. Skinner who was the guru of the mess that passes for education in America today.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Though hard to believe even now, the US adopted the Soviet Communist approach to education. In 1961, Rep. John M. Ashbrook tried to alert Congress to what was happening. Citing a document published by the Department of Health, Education and Welfare called "A Federal Education Agency for the Future, " he called the new education programs "a blueprint for complete domination and direction of our schools from Washington. Guess what? He was right.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]That is why the educational reform this nation really needs is the complete elimination of the US Department of Education. It won’t happen. For the same reason we are now only learning that those "Red baiters" of the 1950’s were right to assert the Department of State was shot through with Communists, no one in 2001 is going to believe that the US Department of Education is modeled on Communist theories.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The Subversion of Education in America: Lesson #2
    By Alan Caruba
    [/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Just how did education in America turn from being a system that imparts knowledge to one that uses behavior modification techniques to influence the attitudes and beliefs of those passing through it?[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]To achieve this, beginning in the 1960’s, the perpetrators of the subversion have employed deception to achieve their goals. Earlier this month, a New Jersey daily newspaper ran an editorial, "Let board members speak", noting that members of a local school board had been restricted from speaking to the press to avoid "confusion" about the board’s programs and objectives. "But this isn’t about ‘confusion’," said the editorial. "It’s about control", adding "And it is insulting to the public and the idea of open local government."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]There is nothing "open" about the effort to subvert education in America. It only has that appearance because it takes place at presumably local school boards or in a state education department. Always, the vehicle is a governmental agency. The controlling player, however, is the US Department of Education.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif][​IMG]The objective of those who control our educational systems has long been to produce poorly educated, little world citizens, ready to forego the liberties guaranteed by the oldest living Constitution. The system introduced into American schools mirrors the Soviet and Communist Chinese systems that produce a compliant and complacent population.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]To achieve this, they have had to dumb-down the students passing through the system. On February 17<sup>, </sup>2001, the Los Angeles Times reported that the president of the University of California "wants to eliminate the SAT as a requirement for admission to all eight of the university’s undergraduate campuses." What a great way to further dilute all standards for academic achievement![/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]In January 2001, the Times reported that the University of California kicked out 2,009 students, six percent of last year’s freshman class, for failing to master basic math and English skills in their first year of classes. These are skills that should have been mastered in their first twelve years in California schools! It means that the diplomas they received are worthless pieces of paper.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]This pattern repeats itself from state to state because it is the educational system that is failing American students. The President’s emphasis on testing misses the point entirely![/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]In the January/February 2001 issue of The American Enterprise, devoted to why some few schools succeed while the majority fail, Karl Zinsmeister writes that "it’s extremely interesting how many common traits are shared by the successful schools we profile. A remarkably similar basic formula applies in almost all of these places: high demands on students, strict discipline, a strong and unapologetic moral component, including a respect for religion, an emphasis on teaching intellectual basics, a preference for time-tested books and curricula, clear standards of dress, grooming, and comportment, and an insistence on politeness, respect and courtesy."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Compare that to schools in your area where the way students dress is an offense to decorum, the language they use is replete with profanities, and their chief complaint is that they have too much homework.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]President Bush has bought into the Education Establishment’s systematic stupification of students. He is not the first President to fall prey to this effort. To learn the facts, you must read The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The President has proposed a five billion-dollar program to help children learn to read. Please! Please, please, will someone explain to me why spending even more money will answer the question of why our schools, soaking up billions a year, are NOT teaching this already?[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]One need only look at the realities of education in Texas to see why the call for national testing standards is a deception. An excellent article by Jerry Jesness in the November 2000 issue of Reason magazine blows away the hype about the test scores of Texas students. Despite apparent improvements, a closer look at the test scores of basic skills places young Texans in 39<sup>th</sup> place for SAT scores.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]In 1984, the State adopted the Texas Educational Assessment of Minimal Skills that established minimal standards for graduation. The result has been that a considerable amount of time is spent "teaching to the test" in schools throughout Texas. Students are taught strategies to pass the text. For example, the acquisition of real arithmetical skills is sacrificed to methods that include drawing and counting sticks! This is not progress and the test is, essentially, meaningless.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]All this was foretold back in the 1970’s as the "educrats" continued their efforts to undermine the teaching of basic knowledge. In 1976, Catherine Barrett, then president of the National Education Association, gave a speech in which she said, "First, we will help all of our people understand that school is a concept and not a place. We will not confuse "schooling" with education. The school will be the community, the community the school." This predates Hillary Clinton’s "it takes a village" concept, but it reflects a communist view that all of society must be employed to form the views of students. Individualism is bad. Conforming to the group is good.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Barrett went on to say "We will need to recognize that so-called ‘basic skills’ which currently represent nearly the total effort in elementary schools, will be taught in one quarter of the present school day. The remaining time will be devoted to what is truly fundamental and basic---time for academic inquiry, time for students to develop their own interests, time for a dialogue between students and teachers…more than a dispenser of information, the teacher will be a conveyor of values, a philosopher. Students will learn to write love letters and lab notes."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]You may want to read this again. The then-head of the NEA was talking about turning the school day into one devoted to just about everything other than the teaching of reading, writing and arithmetic. Teachers were, instead, to become "agents of change."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The change incorporated into today’s educational programs is intended to change the entire social structure of our society and the values that had made it great. Competition and achievement in the acquisition of basic knowledge and the skills to implement that knowledge are jettisoned in favor of changing attitudes about family, patriotism, religion, and sexuality. Look around you and ask yourself why we now except all forms of "families." Look around you and ask why we live in a cultural environment drenched with sexuality without responsibility. Ask yourself why millions fail to vote. Look at the way the expression of religious values is continually derided.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]In 1972, Dr. Chester M. Pierce, MD, of Harvard University wrote an article entitled "Becoming Planetary Citizens: A Quest for Meaning" that appeared in the November issue of Childhood Education. He was concerned that children, by the age of five, "already have a lot of political attitudes", among which were "a tenacious loyalty to his country and its leader." What he wanted was a child who entered kindergarten "with the same kind of loyalty to the earth as to his homeland…"[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]This is a formula for degrading patriotism and loyalty to everything for which this nation stands in favor of creating citizens of the "global government" being pursued by the United Nations and the environmentalism that preaches against the use of the earth’s natural resources.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]All throughout the 1970’s, the Federal government funded these goals. Local educational systems were taken over by programs designed to destroy local control.I do not want President Bush’s education proposals to succeed because they reflect the continued subversion of our nation’s schools by the Department of Education.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The process dates back to the 1960’s, continued through the 1970’s, and in the following discussion of education in America, we will see how they increased through the 1980’s.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The Subversion of Education in America: Lesson #3
    By Alan Caruba
    [/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]This will come as a surprise to you—everything about the nation’s educational system does—but Congress back in 1970 recognized that the federal government is supposed to have limited authority when it comes to education. An amended General Education Provisions Act specifically articulated a "Prohibition against Federal Control of Education.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]It forbids the federal government from exercising any "direction, supervision, or control over the curriculum, program of instruction, administration or personnel of any education institution, school, or school system, or over the selection of library resources, textbooks, or other printed or published instructional materials by any educational institution or school system."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The loophole through which the subversion of our education system was accomplished was federal funding of "research" and "development."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]By the 1980’s (see the previous two editions of Warning Signs for a look at the 1960’s and 1970’s by clicking on the Archives below) the effort to turn schools from places where students actually learn something to places where their values, beliefs, and cognitive skills were determined by "Outcome Based Education", behavior modification programs. The objective of these programs is to turn students in to little citizens of a one-world government where they are mere economic units, not individuals, nor people who give much thought to individual liberty.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Individual liberty was the reason the American Revolution was fought and is the philosophical basis for every word in the US Constitution. A generation or two of Americans who are systematically robbed of any knowledge of this are ripe for an authoritarian takeover.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif][​IMG]The father of this movement is Prof. Benjamin Bloom and his book, "All Our Children learning." Published in 1981, it is the bible of OBE. In it he says, "The purpose of education and the schools is to change the thoughts, feelings, and actions of students." No, the purpose of education is to provide students with a sufficient knowledge of basic skills in writing, reading, arithmetic, as well as history and the sciences. Thus prepared, they are likely to be the kind of citizens that will question efforts to deprive this nation of its sovereignty in favor of a world government run out of the United Nations.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]It gets worse. Writing in The Effective School Report, Dr. Thomas A. Kelly, Ph.D., stated that "The brain should be used for processing, not storage." This is the view of education that says you prepare students to take a test determined by federal standards of what they should know. The student is merely to process predetermined bits and pieces of information. The best example of this is the rat’s maze where the rat learns to follow a specific path to get a piece of cheese.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]This is a simplified explanation of why today’s children have difficulty acquiring and retaining a body of useful, long-term information such as multiplication tables or who the nation’s presidents have been, the 50 States of the Union, when the Civil War was fought, where India can be found on a map, the names of the earth’s oceans, et cetera![/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The whole movement to utterly change the direction and purpose of our nation’s schools picked up momentum in the 1980’s and, sorry to say it, it occurred on Ronald Reagan’s watch. The harsh truth about the subversion of the nation’s schools has not been a Democratic or Republican program. It has occurred no matter who was in office or who controlled Congress. It happened because few politicians were paying any attention to what was really occurring over at the Department of Education.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]In her book, "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America", Charlotte Thompson Iserbyt, says, "The real purpose of this project was to propose a radical redesign of the nation’s education system from one based on inputs to one based on outputs." It switched, in other words, from a curriculum of content a student was required to learn, to a series of answers the student was supposed to repeat when tested. Or as Iserbyt explains it, the system turned away "from one oriented toward the learning of academic content to one based on performance of selected skills, necessary for the implementation of school-to-work…" The schools, with direction from the DOE and grants from major foundations, as well as input from corporate leaders, were redesigned to produce workers.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Well, what’s so bad about that? We need workers. Ask anyone responsible for the management of any size organization, from a local bakery to a major corporation, what their primary problem is and they will tell you it’s finding good workers. That is to say, finding people with even the most basic education or skills to perform any job with a minimum of competency. That is the result of the education system that has been foisted on this nation.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Take away their pocket calculators and the newest generation of workers cannot add or subtract. Take away "spell check" on their computers and they are helpless to spell accurately. These are basic skills Americans used to learn in one-room schoolhouses heated with a wood-burning oven. They could also tell you the branches of the US government and a whole lot more than today’s graduates.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]In the 1980’s the DOE says Iserbyt, "effectively transformed the essential character of the nation’s public schools from ‘teaching’---the most traditional and conservative role of schools---to ‘workforce training’---perceived as liberal and ‘progressive.’" It is a particular irony that one of Ronald Reagan’s campaign platforms was the abolishing of the Department of Education. He was right. He didn’t do it.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]What, in fact, happened was that control of the schools and their curriculums increasing moved up the decision-making ladder away from local school boards and even state education departments. Administrators and teachers were delighted with this because it eliminated the "meddling" of locally elected and locally responsible school board members.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The instrument for this was the development of a "Course Goals Collection" completed by the DOE in 1980-81. "The collection consists of fourteen volumes with 15,000 goals covering every major subject taught in the public schools from K-12." Remember that 1970 prohibition on any federal government involvement in instruction? Nobody else did either.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]In 1981, 70,000 copies were distributed, despite the fact that only approximately 16,000 school districts existed. And you wonder why every state now has the same goals? With remarkable success, Outcome-Based Education became the way American students were to be trained to believe the same things, have the same values, and to ignore those they were taught at home.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]This is important because values are supposed to be the job of parents. Some parents are Catholic. Some parents are Protestant. Some are Jewish or Moslem. Some are liberal and some are conservative. Their values no longer seem to matter. That’s why there no longer is a moment of prayer in any school in America. That’s why the school day often does not begin with the salute to the flag or a recitation of a pledge of allegiance. Much of the day is spent "teaching to the test" whose standards were determined in Washington, D.C., not by the parents, not by the local school board, not by anyone you know![/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]How was this achieved? Because, according to a 1981 report by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, "Federal funds account for approximately ten percent of national expenditures on education. The Federal share of educational research and related activities, however, is ninety percent of the total national investment."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Thus, as Iserbyt notes in her book, "just about everything that goes on in the classrooms of American public schools, with the exception of salaries, school buildings, buses, and the purchase of equipment, is either a direct or indirect result of funding by the U.S. Department of Education—as research!"[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]It should come as no surprise that, by the end of the 1980’s, writing in the January 25, 1989 issue of Education Week, Chester E. Finn, Jr., the former head of the DOE’s research branch, would tell business leaders that he favored a "national curriculum." Flashback to the congressional prohibition on a curriculum determined at the federal level. Consider it null and void. The people in the DOE obviously did.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Little wonder, too, that in 1989, then-President George H. Bush unveiled "America 2000" (now known as "Goals 2000") to the National Governor’s Association that virtually set in concrete the whole behavior modification movement that has been foisted on the American education system.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]That same year, the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development’s Elementary Global Education Framework was announced. Its goals were to create "Human beings whose home is planet earth, who are citizens of a multicultural democratic society in an increasingly interconnected world, and who learn, care, think, choose, and act, to celebrate life on this planet, and to meet the global challenges confronting Humankind."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]NO! We are talking about AMERICAN students going to AMERICAN schools in the sovereign nation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. We are not sending kids to school to become citizens of the world, programmed to deal with global challenges, i.e., threats to the environment that require we all cut back on the use of energy or pick up the bill to bring developing nations up to speed. That is exactly the game plan of the United Nations and the worldwide conspiracy of socialists masquerading as environmentalists.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]That is, however, what is going on in our schools TODAY. That’s why President George W. Bush’s proposal to throw $5 billion at those schools, presumably to teach a subject, reading, they should already be teaching, is a continuation of the same bad ideas that president’s since Eisenhower have been rubber-stamping. And then ignoring.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The Subversion of Education in America: Lesson #4
    By Alan Caruba
    [/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]I have lived my whole life in an affluent, suburban community in Northern New Jersey. When I attended its schools in the 1940’s and 1950s, the vast percentage of graduating seniors went onto college. Their parents had migrated from Newark during or just after WWII because the schools had an excellent reputation. Today, they are not much better than those of the inner city.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Here’s an excerpt from a letter to the editor in our local weekly. "I understand that our education officials have yet to detail for the public exactly what measures have been taken to ensure that a first-rate education will be provided for students." This stonewalling is endemic to education bureaucrats across the nation. He thinks he’s going to get an answer. He won’t.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]"I was horrified to learn that 34 percent of the eighth grade students in (our) Middle School were found only partially proficient—the worst grouping—in the 2000 GEPA math section. Simply put, we rank 97<sup>th</sup> out of 97 schools in this failing category. Further, this dreadful performance has been repeated over the past several years.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]"As a homeowner and a taxpayer, I want to know how the district’s school budget increased from $5l million five years ago to $70 million today, a 37 percent increase over four years, during which time these poor test scores have not gotten measurably better and our last place ranking has not moved out of the cellar."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif] Throwing more and more money at our nation’s current education system is not the answer. The system is inherently flawed because it is not intended to provide a basic 3R’s education.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]President Bush proposes to introduce a national educational standard and then test to it, but we already know American students are deficient in all the areas of knowledge the schools are supposed to be teaching. The tests today’s students take are more about their values than about any body of knowledge they have acquired. Today’s schools are not about educating students. They are about teaching attitudes and values.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]If you have been reading my series over the past three commentaries in this series, you already know that the system has been designed to deliberately dumb down students.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The architects of this attack on our nation’s youth can be found in the US Department of Education. They have adopted psychological methods of conditioning and jettisoned the teaching of information and basic skills. It is called "Outcome-Based Education."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Today’s students, as opposed to their grandfather’s or even their father’s education, are being systematically conditioned to think in "global" terms about humanity, nations, religions, and, of course, the environment. They are conditioned to be citizens, not of the United States, but of the world. That’s what you need when you’re creating a socialist one-world governmental system and that is exactly what is occurring at the United Nations.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Today’s students are taught not to make value judgments about other[​IMG] nations, even if they are authoritarian dictatorships. They may not know where Brazil is on the map, but they "know" all the rain forests are disappearing. They don’t know when the Civil War took place or why, but they "know" that all the Founding Fathers were slave-owners. They also "know" that America’s history is one of destroying the native Indian nations, taking their land, and exploiting it with farms, mining, and the destruction of whole forests. They cannot tell you what the Bill of Rights is, but they "know" the US is the leading contributor of "greenhouse gases" to the atmosphere, thereby causing global warming. It is a full course of lies.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]They haven’t a clue about the individualism, sacrifice, daring and innovation that made this nation great, nor its political system, and most certainly not its history.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]As Charlotte Thompson Iserbyt writes in her book, [/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America[/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif], they aren’t being "taught the difference between free enterprise and planned economies, i.e., socialism; between ‘group thinking’ and individual freedom and responsibility."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]By the 1990’s the decades of effort to overturn an education system that taught specific bodies of information and the skills to use them—arithmetic, spelling, history, civics, science—had effectively been transformed into today’s touchy-feely system. It is a place where a student’s feelings of self-esteem are more important than whether they actually know anything other than the specific answers to the test. Thus teachers now "teach to the test" (their paycheck depends on it) rather than provide a broader body of knowledge. It is a place where competition is discouraged as unfair to those less qualified for any reason. It is a place where socialist attitudes and values are the priority, not knowledge.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Given President George W. Bush’s enthusiasm for education that is "accountable" and "will leave no child behind", will it surprise anyone that the "America 2000 Plan", written in 1991, was presented to the American people by Lamar Alexander, the Secretary of Education serving his father, President George Herbert Walker Bush?[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The "America 2000 Plan" proposed to radically restructure American society, beginning with its schools. It was intended to affect 110,00 public and private schools. When you’re trying to create good little socialists, you can’t afford to have anyone who is being taught to think independently or asked to incorporate moral and ethical values.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]The "voucher" program exists to give the federal government control over private schools because, whoever pays the piper, chooses the tune. Schools that accept voucher students will soon find themselves required to accept federal education regulations as well.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Goals 2000 and School-to-Work programs introduced to transform our schools reflect what Iserbyt describes as "the internationalization of education with exchanges of data systems, curricula, methods, et cetera, all essential for the implementation of the international socialist management and control system being put in place right now."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Everything, including the SAT college entrance tests, has been degraded to mask the dumbing down those who are passing through our schools. Today’s SATs permit students to use electronic calculators, ask fewer questions in general and fewer multiple-choice math questions in particular. Reading passages now ask definitions from context and the formerly difficult antonym section, calling for linguistic and intellectual subtleties, has been dropped entirely.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]My hometown’s parent who could not get any answers from his district’s school board could not know that this is repeated across America in school after school. Parents are routinely lied to. Worse, today’s parents are often required to put their child put on a regimen of Ritalin, a mind-altering drug. We’ve got seven million government-approved drug addicts going to school in drug-free zones![/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]To the individual parent, there seems to be no way to resist the juggernaut of a system that routinely turns out thousands of "educated" morons. Some choose to home-school their children. Others who can afford it send them to private schools. Still others shell out for after-school tutoring services. Why? Because the schools have been "restructured."[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif] President Bush is not providing a solution. He is part of the problem. His father was part of the problem. Presidents going back to Eisenhower have been part of the problem because they failed to see that introducing Soviet-style educational methods—behavior modification to produce good little socialists--into American schools was destined to bring us to this point.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Education is not about national standards and national testing. It’s about individual schools in individual school districts, all answerable to their communities and to the parents of the children entrusted to them. It’s not about how the child feels, but about how well the child learns. There is pride in learning, but if there are no grades, how does anyone, parent, child or teacher know what, if anything, is being learned?[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Congress will probably give President Bush the $5 billion he wants to throw away on failed reading programs, and money for the national educational standards and testing he wants. Previous Congresses have gone along, failing or refusing to see how the educational system has been corrupted. The Republican "Contract with America" and the campaign promise of Ronald Reagan to dismantle the Department of Education had it right. It didn’t happen. It is the only hope to reverse the damage and return schools to local control.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]Sit down with your child and watch "Jeopardy" together. If neither you, nor your child knows the answer to anything other than the television or film questions, you’re in trouble. Now multiply that against an entire population of Americans who don’t know the answers either.[/FONT]​
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Arial, Verdana, serif]END[/FONT]​
    </td></tr></tbody></table>
     
  17. melbo

    melbo Hunter Gatherer Administrator Founding Member

    Back to normal
     
  1. Yard Dart
  2. Matteo10572
  3. Ganado
  4. tulianr
  5. Mindgrinder
  6. tacmotusn
  7. CATO
  8. CATO
  9. CATO
  10. Quigley_Sharps
  11. Brokor
  12. RightHand
  13. Quigley_Sharps
  14. Clyde
  15. Tracy
  16. Tracy
  17. <exile>
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary
17282WuJHksJ9798f34razfKbPATqTq9E7