rp is "f'in nuts"...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Tango3, Nov 23, 2007.

  1. Tango3

    Tango3 Aimless wanderer

  2. Minuteman

    Minuteman Chaplain Moderator Founding Member

    Gee, fiscal responsible policies, more personal freedom, less .gov interference in peoples lives, abolish the nanny state, bring our troops home and quit meddling in the affairs of and policing the rest of the world, secure our borders, build up our military as a deterrent to any terrorist scum who would dare think of attacking us, return our government to the servant of the people not the master.
    Damn!!! That's pretty F'n nuts!!!!!!!!!!!!
  3. Tango3

    Tango3 Aimless wanderer

    yeah I know..I was shocked to find it published on an alternative site like gnn...
  4. Evenglischatiest

    Evenglischatiest Monkey+++

    Wooo Hoooo!!!! [touchdown]b::[touchdown]

    I'm a wacko!!!!

    I mean I'm f***ing crazy.
    For a man whose hindsight is 20-290, at best, I'm not convinced he can make the jump from wacko to crazy.

    His view of history is... Uhhhhhhhhh... Unconventional. Make that f***ing crazy. I wonder what color the sky is, in his world.

    Something has been bugging me for a long time about Paul detractors, and I'm wondering if I'm the only one noticing it. Form what I've seen, there's a distinct feeling among the sheeple that we're crazy BECAUSE we know what we're talking about. If we stick to the typical "four legs good, two legs bad" level of political discussion, everything's fine. But even the mere mention of the Constitution, except in the context of Bush's betrayal thereof, draws a permanent label of conspiracy nut.

    Perhaps the time has come for some form of basic poll test. M
    aybe we'd be required to give the general idea of 2 or 3 amendments. Not pointless facts, like whether RKBA is the second, or eighth. I mean something real like, "Describe three rights enumerated in the Constitution." The painfully large contingent who quotes Marx instead of Hamilton, would have to do a little research before they could vote.

    In addition, it seems to me that if you can't name at least 2 of the people running for an office, you haven't studied the race enough for your vote to be worth listening to.

    Oh yeah. The test should be conducted IN ENGLISH ONLY.

survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary