SPECIAL REPORT 08.08.2006 Special Report: A New Phase of the War We have not written publicly available alerts on the Israel-Hezbollah conflict for several days, simply because there has been nothing to report. This is not to say that nothing was happening; brutal fighting was going on, rockets were being fired and airstrikes were being carried out. However, the basic pattern of the war appeared to be fixed, with Israeli troops fighting well-entrenched Hezbollah forces in southern Lebanon, and with the results of those battles uncertain. The diplomatic process was lurching along without any clear direction. We are now beginning to detect some changes on the Israeli side. At its meeting Aug. 7, the Israeli Cabinet appeared to have given up on a diplomatic solution -- if it ever actually believed diplomacy would work -- and made it clear that Israeli forces were going to be given a much freer hand in Lebanon. Today, Israeli Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz announced that Deputy Chief of Staff Maj. Gen. Moshe Kaplinsky was to become Halutz's representative at Northern Command -- which owns the Lebanese operation -- for the duration of the war. There are political ramifications for this in Israel Defense Forces, but what is essentially being done is that Kaplinsky, an army officer who commanded the elite Golani Brigade, has been put in charge of the Lebanese operation. Halutz, an air force officer who had been criticized for waging an extended air campaign that did not shut down rocket attacks, is ceding authority over the war. Obviously, this is also a criticism of Northern Command's performance over the past weeks -- but the important message, following recent Israeli Cabinet decisions, is that the Israelis are going to unleash their ground forces. What this means is unclear. It might mean that one or more additional divisions will be thrown into the southern Lebanese campaign, trying to force a decision. It might mean that the attack into the Bekaa Valley that we have discussed is in the works. It could also mean that Israel might move toward Beirut. What seems to be happening, however, is that the Israelis are moving beyond the current phase of the war. As we have said, Hezbollah has relatively few options. In the south, the militants are committed to a static defense that they seem to be executing well. In the Bekaa Valley, they might opt to resist or to draw the Israelis in and then try to impose an insurgency on them. The same in the southern Beirut area. They might also decide to try and launch some of the longer-range rockets they claim to have, assuming the Israeli air force hasn't taken them out. Much is unclear. However, this is intended to alert you that the Israelis are vigorously signaling a shift in their war fighting strategy. This may be intended to induce a new round of diplomacy, but we rather doubt it. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has run out of room on the strategy he was following. A new one is likely. Send questions or comments on this article to analysis@stratfor.com.</pre>
Digging deeply and rather uncertainly into long unremembered memories, back in the days of wooden ships and iron men, I think ships in distress were authorized to hoist the colors upside down as a distress signal. This predates neat things like radio --
I noticed it too, I was just waiting for the punchline before I posted. Did you find out the origin and meaning, or was it just a mistake?
A couple of things just don't add up for me in the U.S. distress photo. First if you look at the white flag beside the US one you can make out ???? hotel. So wherever it is it's a hotel. Secondly although the flag poles look like they are tall flag poles and we are seeing the tops there is a red and white cross arm underneath the flags. It just looks out of place. Lastly while this is obviously a parking garage why is the top and the road look dry but the middle area/ floor looks like it just go hosed down? Just alot of questions that I don't have the answer for but maybe we can put it together. Take care Be safe Poacher.
The red and white crossarm is (I think) a gate on the parking floor, not the poles. And, I've seen enough discolored and poor quality concrete that I can easily believe wet is not part of the equation. That said, I'll defer to better eyes.
Ghrit, I'll go with the discolored concrete.I see that crap every day. The crossarm just looks,, well odd at the angle it's at the location etc. Oh for a full photo of this. So Quig where did ya get the photos? are there more that show the same area? maybe we can piece this puzzel together yet. Take care Be safe, Poacher.
Here is the code: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode04/usc_sec_04_00000008----000-.html (a) The flag should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property. I assume it is a hotel in Israel, maybe in Haifa? It really doesn't look that appropriate, first off if there was immediate danger wouldn't the swinging gate be pulled out as an obstacle? I would also expect to see more security, unless of course they were taking cover from rocket attack.
I think it is an American hotel in Israel. The flag looks familiar, but I can't place which hotel it is. I used to travel a lot, and spent the better part of about four years in hotels and this one looks really familiar.