BOHICA, NWO, here it comes

Discussion in 'Freedom and Liberty' started by tacmotusn, Jun 3, 2015.


Tags:
  1. tacmotusn

    tacmotusn Mosquito Sailor

    United States Announces World Police Force
    .
    United States Announces World Police Force - Freedom Outpost
    .
    The revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences has produced a crisis in human history. In order to overcome the danger of nuclear war now confronting mankind, the United States has introduced at the Sixteenth General Assembly of the United Nations a Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.

    This new program provides for the progressive reduction of the war-making capabilities of nations and the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions to settle disputes and maintain the peace. It sets forth a series of comprehensive measures which can and should be taken in order to bring about a world in which there will be freedom from war and security for all states. It is based on three principles deemed essential to the achievement of practical progress in the disarmament field:

    First, there must be immediate disarmament action:

    A strenuous and uninterrupted effort must be made toward the goal of general and complete disarmament; at the same time, it is important that specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible.

    Second, all disarmament obligations must be subject to effective international controls:

    The control organization must have the manpower, facilities, and effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process.

    Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established:

    There is an inseparable relationship between the scaling down of national armaments on the one hand and the building up of international peace-keeping machinery and institutions on the other. Nations are unlikely to shed their means of self-protection in the absence of alternative ways to safeguard their legitimate interests. This can only be achieved through the progressive strengthening of international institutions under the United Nations and by creating a United Nations Peace Force to enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.

    There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The full text of the program is contained in an appendix to this pamphlet.

    SUMMARY

    DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES

    The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
    In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:

    • The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
    • The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
    • The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;
    • The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
    TASK OF NEGOTIATING STATES

    The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved. To this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form part of the total program.

    GOVERNING PRINCIPLES

    The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:

    • As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations must be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of disputes;
    • Disarmament must proceed as rapidly as possible, until it is completed, in stages containing balanced, phased, and safeguarded measures;
    • Each measure and stage should be carried out in an agreed period of time, with transition from one stage to the next to take place as soon as all measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and verified and as soon as necessary arrangements for verification of the next stage have been made;
    • Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed forces and armaments in excess of those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process; and
    • Disarmament must take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state.
    DISARMAMENT STAGES

    The program provides for progressive disarmament steps to take place in three stages and for the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions.

    FIRST STAGE


    The first stage contains measures which would significantly reduce the capabilities of nations to wage aggressive war. Implementation of this stage would mean that:

    • The nuclear threat would be reduced:
      All states would have adhered to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons.
      The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons would be stopped and quantities of such materials from past production would be converted to non-weapons uses.
      States owning nuclear weapons would not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and would not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture.
      States not owning nuclear weapons would not manufacture them or attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states.
      A Commission of Experts would be established to report on the feasibility and means for the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
    • Strategic delivery vehicles would be reduced:
      Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles of specified categories and weapons designed to counter such vehicles would be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps; their production would be discontinued or limited; their testing would be limited or halted.
    • Arms and armed forces would be reduced:
      The armed forces of the United States and the Soviet Union would be limited to 2.1 million men each (with appropriate levels not exceeding that amount for other militarily significant states); levels of armaments would be correspondingly reduced and their production would be limited.
      An Experts Commission would be established to examine and report on the feasibility and means of accomplishing verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of all chemical, biological and radiological weapons.
    • Peaceful use of outer space would be promoted:
      The placing in orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction would be prohibited.
      States would give advance notification of space vehicle and missile launchings.
    • U.N. peace-keeping powers would be strengthened:
      Measures would be taken to develop and strengthen United Nations arrangements for arbitration, for the development of international law, and for the establishment in Stage II of a permanent U.N. Peace Force.
    • An International Disarmament Organization would be established for effective verification of the disarmament program:
      Its functions would be expanded progressively as disarmament proceeds.
      It would certify to all states that agreed reductions have taken place and that retained forces and armaments do not exceed permitted levels.
      It would determine the transition from one stage to the next.
    • States would be committed to other measures to reduce international tension and to protect against the chance of war by accident, miscalculation, or surprise attack:
      States would be committed to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter and to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
      A U.N. peace observation group would be available to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
      States would be committed to give advance notice of major military movements which might cause alarm; observation posts would be established to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
    SECOND STAGE

    The second stage contains a series of measures which would bring within sight a world in which there would be freedom from war. Implementation of all measures in the second stage would mean:

    • Further substantial reductions in the armed forces, armaments, and military establishments of states, including strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and countering weapons;
    • Further development of methods for the peaceful settlement of disputes under the United Nations;
    • Establishment of a permanent international peace force within the United Nations;
    • Depending on the findings of an Experts Commission, a halt in the production of chemical, bacteriological and radiological weapons and a reduction of existing stocks or their conversion to peaceful uses;
    • On the basis of the findings of an Experts Commission, a reduction of stocks of nuclear weapons;
    • The dismantling or the conversion to peaceful uses of certain military bases and facilities wherever located; and
    • The strengthening and enlargement of the International Disarmament Organization to enable it to verify the steps taken in Stage II and to determine the transition to Stage III.
    THIRD STAGE

    During the third stage of the program, the states of the world, building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final steps toward the goal of a world in which:

    • States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
    • The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
    • The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
    • The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
    Appendix

    DECLARATION ON DISARMAMENT

    THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM
    FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT
    IN A PEACEFUL WORLD


    The Nations of the world,
    Conscious of the crisis in human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;
    Determined to save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic aspirations;
    Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament under effective international control and where the resources of nations shall be devoted to man's material, cultural, and spiritual advance;
    Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:
    (a) The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
    (b) The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
    (c) The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations;
    (d) The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
    Call on the negotiating states:
    (a) To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved;
    (b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date;
    (c) Also to seek --- without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program --- agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a part of that program.
    Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:
    (a) Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safeguarded measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed period of time.
    (b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed levels at any stage.
    (c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state, whether or not a party to an international agreement or treaty.
    (d) As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of differences as well as to facilitate the development of international cooperation in common tasks for the benefit of mankind.
    (e) Transition from one stage of disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be necessary for the next stage have been instituted.
    Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:

    STAGE I

    A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:
    (a) An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall be established within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for the effective verification of the disarmament program.
    (b) The IDO shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3) an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the functions of the Organization.
    (c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition from one stage to the next.


    B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
    (a) Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.
    (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.
    (d) A Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of their production.

    C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
    (a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.
    (b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.
    (c) Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
    (d) Any fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be developed in agreement with the IAEA.
    (e) States owning nuclear weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information or materials necessary for their manufacture.
    (f) A Nuclear Experts Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.

    D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
    (a) Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished in each step by transfers to depots supervised by the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the vehicles that have been placed under the supervision of the IDO shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (b) Production of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued or limited.
    (c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.

    .
    continued
    .
    E. To Promote the Peaceful Use of Outer Space:
    (a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.
    (b) States shall give advance notification to participating states and to the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the track of the vehicle.

    F. To Reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack:
    (a) States shall give advance notification to the participating states and to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.
    (b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
    (c) There shall also be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.
    (d) An international commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine and make recommendations on the possibility of further measures to reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure of communication.

    G. To Keep the Peace:
    (a) States shall reaffirm their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force--including nuclear, conventional, or CBR--contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.
    (b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
    (c) States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and for the codification and progressive development of international law.
    (d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.
    (e) A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre of observers who could be dispatched to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.

    STAGE II

    A. International Disarmament Organization:
    The powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken in Stage II.

    B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
    (a) Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.
    (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (c) There shall be further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.
    (d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall be dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.
    (e) Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons, the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.

    C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
    Stocks of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the Nuclear Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall be transferred to peaceful purposes.

    D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
    Further reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.

    E. To Keep the Peace:
    During Stage II, states shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the United Nations, to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and principles of the United Nations:
    (a) States shall agree upon strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the United Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.
    (b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.
    (c) States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement of disputes and differences.

    STAGE III

    By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N. should have reached a point where the states of the world can move forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct.

    The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which:
    (a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
    (b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
    (c) The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.

    (d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.

    The United States did in fact announce a world police force, and they did it more than 50 years ago. Today it is called NATO.

    The above text is copied verbatim from U.S. Department of State Publication 7277, Freedom from War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World, Disarmament Series 5, Office of Public Services, Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., O 609147.

    If you are unfamiliar with this document and don't believe its authenticity, here is a direct link sourced from the United States Senate's official government website.

    This document was drafted by former U.S. National Security Advisor and Secretary of State, Heinz Alfred Kissinger, a German national and Soviet deep cover agent (code named "Bor") who had changed his birth name to "Henry" to evade suspicion of his conspiratorial espionage. State Department Publication 7277 was personally delivered to the United Nations by President John F. Kennedy in September of 1961.

    It is the official policy of the United States of America, and reveals the plans of the federal government of the United States to retroactively transfer its military forces to the United Nations. It specifically outlines an ongoing agenda to combine the police and military forces of the United States of America with Russia in three distinct stages, into what will be the "peace-keeping" forces of the new world government under the authority of the United Nations bureaucracy.

    "The meaning of peace," explained socialist revolutionary Karl Marx, "is the absence of opposition to socialism."

    That statement—which I have often cited due to its extreme importance—holds a lot of weight, because anyone who has made an honest study of the United Nations knows that it was founded by socialists, and the Charter of the United Nations—an almost word-for-word duplicate of the Constitution of the Soviet Union—was penned by socialists. The truth is, the Charter of the United Nations is slated by its framers to be the "World Constitution."

    Ultimately, according to the collectivist plan introduced by the U.S. State Department, the only military force will be a world police force under the United Nations in sufficient numbers with state-of-the-art technology to field overwhelming force against any perceived threat to the world supra-government. The military of the United States of America is currently filling the requirement. It is currently in stage two, and moving into the final stage of the plan.

    Understanding the successes to date since the introduction of 7277, the Senior Officer Corps of all of our military forces have betrayed their Oaths of allegiance to the Constitution for the United States of America, the Supreme Law of our guaranteed Republican form of government, and have joined the conspiracy to end our national sovereignty and unite with other U.N. member states under a totalitarian socialist world government.

    "E Pluribus Unum." Out of Many, One.

    You see, none of this is new. This subject is what originally compelled me to write and disseminate information, and I have written extensively and documented the structural build-up of a tyrannical military police state/martial law scenario in this country, and enumerated the punishments for treason as defined in the law [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].

    The particular agenda to create a world police force has been (at least) 54 years in the planning stages, and probably a long time before that. Considering this, the record-breaking nationwide Special Forces domestic operation Jade Helm 15 to "master the human domain" [1][2][3][4], the U.S. Army Special Operations Command's ARSOF Operating Concept 2022 to "operationalize the CONUS [Continental United States] base" [1][2], the DoD's National Guard State Partnership Program involving 74 nations around the globe evolving "from a 1991 U.S. European command decision," the Justice Department's March 12th announcement to federalize local law enforcement [1][2], are all just extensions of the stated long-term agenda of the United States.

    And for whatever reason you think this may all be transpiring—whether it be preparations for a forthcoming economic collapse, resulting civil unrest and martial law; a Continuity of Government program of the Pentagon to shore-up defenses in preparation for World War III; a federal takeover of the States and disarming of lawful gun owners, purging of political opponents and military commanders; relocating military infrastructure to avoid a forthcoming earthquake, super-volcano, pole shift, the incoming 3,600-year orbit 10th planet discovered in 1979 by the Pioneer space probe, or other extreme weather event; another chapter in blurring the lines between the police and military, desensitizing and normalizing the aberrant shame of a standing army on the streets of America following the end of Posse Comitatus; an operational test of 4th generation warfare or a giant psychological operation of perception management; or all the above—whatever reason you may attach to this burgeoning police state, there is no question that it is happening right before our eyes in accordance with a long-established official framework of documentation, and obviously for a very specific reason.

    Being a veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States, I know that we train where we fight and fight where we train. This is all taking place not for training purposes for the future prospect of foreign deployment, as its public relations arms claim, but for domestic operations in "unconventional warfare" on U.S. soil. After all, employing the assistance of "Interagency Partners" (the DHS, FBI, DEA and local law enforcement) who have no explainable precedent in foreign war as these agencies have no foreign operating charter, has no adequate demonstrable convention.

    $4.2 billion worth of military surplus has been handed over to local police forces by the federal government in recent years. My local police department received a whopping $1.6 million in surplus weapons and military-grade hardware. Many combat veterans have even exclaimed how American cops are more heavily armed than they were as front-line soldiers in active war zones. Hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars are being spent annually to outgun the average American citizen, to position the federal U.S. military forces, agencies and their auxiliary local and state law enforcement partners throughout the continental United States to eliminate the opposition of the United Nations disarmament agenda as their peace-keeping force, and to prepare for a major event to coincide with multiple flashpoints.

    Having discussed this agenda with every active duty military member, veteran and police personnel I know, we all agree unanimously that the federal government of the United States is terrified of We the People getting fed-up, or something else (or both), and is actively planning in concert with local and state law enforcement agencies, for some big forthcoming trigger event. And whatever it is, it's imminent.

    I hope you are likewise shoring up your defenses, because one thing is for sure, something big is about to happen that will change our way of life in this country. If we allow our Creator-endowed Freedom to be stripped, then we will never get it back. Truthfully, if you aren't willing to die in the defense of it, then you probably never deserved it anyway.

    And if you are making a concerted effort to get right with the Almighty, then you know as I do that you have nothing to fear, for if you die in the defense of God and of the principles and ideals which blessed this nation with greatness from its inception, then you will be the only one in the world who is truly free.

    Source


    Read more at United States Announces World Police Force - Freedom Outpost
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2015
    Ganado, Tully Mars and Gopherman like this.
  2. TXKajun

    TXKajun Monkey+++

    Don't really care about what reasons are put forth. Just ask the native americans, Jews, Cambodians, etc what happens when they are deprived of ways of defending themselves.

    No way, bubbas!!
     
    Gopherman likes this.
  3. Gopherman

    Gopherman Sometimes I Wish I Could Go Back to Sleep Site Supporter++

    Can't wait to see who is Running The UN! Taking bet's he'll Have Horns!!:whistle:
    The Spanish Missionaries gave Small Pox Infected blankets to the Indians, where there's a will there's a way!
     
    Ganado likes this.
  4. techsar

    techsar Monkey+++

    US and Russian armed forces get cut to 2.1 million each, but China has free reign.

    No problem with that, right comrade?
     
  5. ghrit

    ghrit Ambulatory anachronism Administrator Founding Member

    When that asinine document was originated, China was still an empire armed with bolt guns and bronze cannons, or so I remember. Not competitive no matter the numbers.
     
    Brokor likes this.
  6. tacmotusn

    tacmotusn Mosquito Sailor

    This document and or plan is obsolete and useless. Rogue Nation States seeking to obtain nukes from any possible source, radical theocracies killing all non believers to their stuck in the 7th century religion, all that is overlooked, because at that time no one had a clue what would be today, and the fact that this entire NWO United Nations plan is sourced with socialist dogma. Commissioned or drafted (written), in 1961 at the direction and approval of then President JFK ... WTF was he thinking. Maybe he deserved that end to his life? To draft a plan to sell the county out to socialism? He, himself a bit of a warmonger.
     
  7. Brokor

    Brokor Live Free or Cry Moderator Site Supporter+++ Founding Member

    I am having trouble finding the actual publication. The link provided does not bring me to the actual document on record.
    I know this link - Freedom from War (1961) -is run by the University of Illinois at Chicago UIC.
    It does appear to be legitimate. The State Department wrote this U.N. proposal and introduced it to the United Nations. As the negotiations progressed, neither side decided that this particular plan was going to meet their needs, so both sides backed away from it. Fortunately, however, the discussions from this U.N. proposal paved the way for nuclear weapon treaties over the next 20 years. The document does NOT (as some claim) carry the weight of LAW and was NOT a goal of any administration since the time it was introduced. The document does not specifically mention removing guns from the hands of Americans who were not in the military, but some might interpret the phrase "national arsenal" to include privately owned guns.

    Additionally, I tried the National Archives, but I cannot find it. Guides to Records at the National Archives

    This is the Department of State publication site: Publications and I cannot locate Dept. of State Publication 7277 of 1961.

    Here's a link to a digitized copy in full (unverified): Freedom From War : Department of State : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

    I believe, from the limited time I have spent searching, that this is something which requires hands-on study to verify. If needed, a trip to the local city hall library may turn up results. Digital records may not exist that far back. Even though this document may be legitimate, it is certainly not a legal act passed by Congress, nor a Presidential Proclamation which is what it would need to be to have the weight of law.

    This being said, it's still obvious that the United Nations is not ideal for a republic such as what we once had, and the best thing we can do as Americans is to influence our Congressional Representatives to never support any involvement in the U.N.

    He was thinking arms reduction, not gun confiscation from citizens. Everything you may believe is contradicted by the evidence I can find.
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2015
    kellory, tacmotusn and chelloveck like this.
  8. tacmotusn

    tacmotusn Mosquito Sailor

    I agree the threat of private gun confiscation may be thin. From our viewpoint even unlikely. From a world view, and the number of civilian disarmed socialist states, the thought of USA becoming totally disarmed (meaning civilians) except for police and military becomes a very real interpretation. Consider how the present administration has pushed beyond the Constitution like a dictator or emperor and thus set precedence for a future POTUS. Anything is possible, even the unconstitutional and unthinkable. Prior to 2008 I would never have believed we would be where we are right now.
    .
    I highlighted in red the area of this document, that if they follow this path addresses where and when they will feel the need to disarm the civilian populace of all firearms. jmho
    .
    Please do continue to dig as deep as you can into this and let us know what you find.
     
    Gopherman and Tully Mars like this.
  9. chelloveck

    chelloveck Diabolus Causidicus

    [​IMG]

    Anyone for a NWO?....G.H.Bush thought it a splendid idea....so long as it was the USA's NWO I guess.
     
    Brokor likes this.
  10. BTPost

    BTPost Old Fart Snow Monkey Moderator

    This is the same reasoning, as to why we keep electing these Dirt Bag Politicos...... " Oh sure, He is a Dirt Bag, but He is OUR Dirt Bag....."
     
  11. Brokor

    Brokor Live Free or Cry Moderator Site Supporter+++ Founding Member

    Yup, lots of folks are in the same boat. It's rather refreshing to know that at least you are counted among the growing many who are starting to run along side the rest of us. Thanks to alternative media and many patriots out there, the establishment is losing credibility every day, and we welcome more into the fold of the "resistance" to tyranny.

    But, when it comes to gun grabbing, pay special attention to what happened in Canada, the U.K. and Australia -especially the U.K. It was seemingly overnight when the confiscations and gun collection points were started. It's all about what happens leading up to that moment in time which really matters. For decades, we have been continuously worn down by progressive legislation, taxation, scheming and plotting. Even before this, way back when prohibition was raging, lots of laws were passed prohibiting firearms. That was the first moment in time when every damn bureaucrat involved should have been tarred and feathered -but that didn't happen.

    When gun confiscations and the grace period for turn ins arrives, I am certain they would have already rounded up the most dangerous veterans, biker gangs and neutralized the militias. I am certain they would make it so unpopular to even show a firearm in public besides an antique shotgun, that folks would report anybody they see. I am certain the men in black body armor will be hitting every citizen they can who owns guns. The overall point I am trying to make is that it's not impossible to do in this country. Folks like to think they will each stand their ground and have a firefight and be willing to die, but those are only words. Even if they are not only words and backed up, (and I am hoping they got their family to safety first), when we do stand our ground, they will most likely be using heavily armored vehicles, drones, and will rather burn your home down than fight you. When we stand together and fight back, assuming there's enough time to do so and we can communicate, I have no doubt the .Gov gun grabbers would lose on many fronts. But, they won't go down THAT path. They want the slow and steady course. They want to wear people down, divide us against ourselves. Use terrorism as a means to create FEAR and have neighbor turn in other neighbors, even children turning in their own parents. Yes, it's not only asymmetrical warfare, it's psychological warfare, too. The moment the ball really drops, YOU won't even know it until it's too late.
     
  12. Brokor

    Brokor Live Free or Cry Moderator Site Supporter+++ Founding Member

    @tacmotusn here's a book on Kissinger I think will prove to be most enlightening. It covers Kennedy and the entire era, especially how many events transpired. I hope you find time to read it. Attached.
    @chelloveck Bush Sr. got his motivation and insight from "Henry" Kissinger.

    You can also read it online if you prefer: Kissinger - The Book by Gary Allen
     

    Attached Files:

    tacmotusn likes this.
  13. Kingfish

    Kingfish Self Reliant

    Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller. Do not underestimate the Trilateral commission when it comes to world government.
     
  1. Yard Dart
  2. Brokor
  3. Brokor
  4. Seacowboys
  5. Tango3
  6. Minuteman
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary
17282WuJHksJ9798f34razfKbPATqTq9E7