Charlie Kirk Assassinated in Utah

How the rifle may have been smuggled in and taken out

 

What third world country did this Bitch come from

 

Who she is is about to be fired
Who is Tamar Shirinian? UT Knoxville faculty member fired over Charlie Kirk comment

"Tamar Shirinian, a faculty member at the University of Knoxville, is set to be terminated over a Facebook comment she made about Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist who was fatally shot on September 9. The University of Tennessee in Knoxville announced Monday that they have placed Shirinian on administrative leave and begun termination proceedings."

Based on her coverage by the Hindustani Times I would guess her heritage is from India, but no idea if she was born or migrated here.

She is a "Cultural Anthropologist" who is a proponent of "decolonization".

 

You beat me to this video. IMO the side view that shows the transfer of energy is proof that the bullet came from the front. He never would have moved backwards had the bullet struck from the back. There is also no way considering the energy that it came from anything other than a rifle.

BTW, I've interacted with Gary multiple times on his other videos. He seems a pretty standup guy and if you have a question on any of the three videos he's done on this subject it's very likely you will get a response and consideration of your question. He might look like a gorilla, but her is very sharp.

 

I'm more inclined to think the shot:
1. Came from Kirks right, elevated and from cover, the "exit" wound would be consistent with that..
2. Was suppressed (with the crowd noise, a small caliber suppressed would not have been heard)
3. Was a smaller caliber round.

1. Kirk wearing a plate has been discussed, heck I thought so too... and was told in this thread that had been debunked... and now I don't think he was... but a statement from authorities that Kirk was wearing a plate would conveniently lock in the theory that the shot came from the front, wouldn't it?

 

Watch the video @Brokor posted. There is a part where you hear the shot and EVERYBODY looks at the position where Robinson was spotted. RE the armor: We are still getting information, but more slowly now. That's not necessarily a conspiracy. It could be to make sure the shit doesn't get off on a technicality. Use your own eyes and your own brain and don't let anybody get in the way of coming to your own conclusions including me.

 

I'm not saying the kid didn't take the shot... I'm just saying I don't think he was the one that shot Charlie... there's a difference. The wound being an exit wound vs. and entrance wound isn't a "technicality".... I've heard Charlie wasn't autopsied... so there is no chance for an entrance wound to be found.

This kid was 3rd row, in front of Charlie, listen to his account. (12:38 in the video)



And this video at 7:42



Apparently autopsy is required but subject to the medical examiners discretion.
Utah Coroner/Medical Examiner Laws
Does the state require that pathologists perform the autopsies?
Yes. If, in the opinion of the medical examiner, an autopsy should be performed or if an autopsy is requested by the district attorney or county attorney having criminal jurisdiction, or by the attorney general, the autopsy shall be performed by the medical examiner or a regional pathologist. Utah Code Ann. § 26-4-6.