Charlie Kirk Assassinated in Utah

That's all bullshit. But we will know soon enough.
Watch the video clip I attached. That's not a hunting rifle round gone wacko. There's zero chance this is a rifle round fired from the front. Also watch the second video clip I am attaching. That's a .50 cal round up close. Physics is literally broken on Charlie Kirk if we are to assume the official narrative is correct.

Edit - @Minuteman What do you think about....air? Yeah, just air.

 

I have no troible believing our government or another could do something like this but in this case I just can't get there. I keep coming back to why? Who benefits? Mossad? How do they gain anything by killing him? A shadow agency in our own government? To what end? Like they say when investigating a crime, follow the money. Who benefits? I dont see any gain from any of these theories. A trump hating, left wing phsyco makes more sense to me. I just think it takes far more mental gymnastics to get to some of these wild theories than it does to accept the facts as they are. I still think its far more likely to be horses than zebras.

 

Exactly. A lone nut taking a shot does make more sense. The problem is, all the evidence we've seen thus far clearly doesn't support the FBI story at all, not one tiny bit. This makes it a huge problem. So, the question then becomes what you asked, why? Would the young man who tested very high and has ties to CIA training on campus be able to take the shot successfully? Yes, it's possible. But, did it happen? No. We can only speculate from here onward, but perhaps the CIA and Mossad simply didn't have a willing shooter to take the fall. They needed a patsy. And with a controlled assassination like this is looking more and more to have been, a 100 percent guarantee on a kill is established. Just to summarize, killing Kirk was the initial goal. They got that accomplished. Now, what about the fallout? The reason is we get a nation further divided, left v. right is always the game being played. This is very much an effort to further the divide, just look at where we are only a week or so into this. From crazies making bold statements and mass censorship and people losing their jobs over what they say, to the conservatives being totally united and standing against everything radical and in full support of any draconian legislation that may pass. If we don't like this assessment, there's always the Zionist angle and the fact that Kirk had been slowly moving away from Israel and even refusing their money. TPUSA has become a very powerful organization...and it wasn't being controlled successfully by the Zionists.

Who benefits? Who always benefits, I say.

You've never seen this. The laws of physics are real, and seemingly Charlie Kirk had skin made of steel if you believe the official narrative.

The video I attached in my previous post is key to understanding. Download it, watch it on a loop. The T-shirt puffs up before he is "shot". And that's the thing...was he shot at all? Wanna talk about deception? People are under the assumption he was shot with a rifle because they heard a gunshot. This is not what it seems.

Oh yeah, Ian comes out with another video right on time...

 

That's the point. We do know the official story is B.S., that's a good starting point.

 

Human neck is different. There's nothing there but soft tissue and only an 8 inch diameter neck at that. Sorry, I've shot steel drums with .223 ballistic tip and they go right through both sides every time. Look up any ballistic test for any rifle round, you won't see a single bullet stop dead within 2" and just sit there. The T-shirt Charlie is wearing shows massive movement that is not indicative of a bullet passing by. I attached a video of a 50 cal bullet passing right next to flour, nothing. No bullet ever from a rifle will behave the way you see in the assassination video. At least not from the front.

The thing is, I'm not even trying to convince anybody of anything. It's just retarded to think this is the way it has been presented. I wish we could ignore physics, I really do. But it just isn't so in this case. Sorry to disappoint. We've been taken as fools yet again. Deal with it.

 

He wasn't, this is confirmed. You guys need to get on point.
Please stop with your hunting stories, unless you've shot people you don't have anything to offer here.

 

Let's keep this topic on point and not compare personal experience. The facts of the case are what matters.

Latest on some of the reported ballistics and the questions raised:


I guess I need to be more clear, so I do apologize. Your hunting stories are great, and I'm sure it will make a terrific thread. However, it sure would be great if we could stay closer to ballistics and humans if you don't mind. It would also be great if we didn't have a contest on who has the most experience at killing people. There are plenty of veterans here, I've spoken with many, and I haven't heard a single argument about magic bullets in this particular case. Now, for the record, this argument is all based on the official narrative which includes a 30-06 rifle at sub 200 yards.

Is it possible that we are dealing with a strange and rare type of fragmented bullet which barely penetrates the skin? I don't know, but I doubt it. I would rather look at all the facts first, then make a better assessment. Therefore, to spell this out plainly, let us look at the pieces from the official story which doesn't add up. Start on page 1 of this thread and come back here. From the towel that doesn't look like it can be a rifle, to the edited video which doesn't show the shooter in position and starts with him running away, to the close up video of Charlie's shirt being blown way up, to the strange wound in the neck which doesn't resemble a clean entrance at all but an exit wound or an entrance wound from a rather peculiar object, to the old man yelling and making a scene, to the alleged shooter ties to the CIA and his relationship with the male trans individual who was instantly released...and the odd Dissord chat messages with no time stamps and no support from Discord proving they are real.

And the list goes on. If any one of these points can be brushed aside, fine. If all of these points can be explained by the FBI with sensible, rational, and provable evidence, GREAT. But, so far this is not the case at all. And the biggest concern is the ballistics, it just isn't adding up.

Now, bullets and deer are great side talk, but I just don't see how it really factors in here given the numerous other problems we are having with physics. Feel free to continue, but please do not demand that people give their experience at killing people to prove a point. That is all.

 

Sorry, I think I meant to ask not to talk about hunting and stay clear of all the weird things we've seen Uncle Buck do with a rifle. I didn't literally mean you have to know how to shoot people to have an opinion. And this led to somebody demanding I provide proof on how many people I have shot...so you see why this thread is trashed now because of this nonsense.

I will prune all of this, send our "debate" to the inferno, and then you two can go at it all day with hunting stories.

My fellow grown ups, good night.