Clinton Calls Impeachment Egregious Abuse

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Quigley_Sharps, Nov 11, 2005.


  1. Quigley_Sharps

    Quigley_Sharps The Badministrator Administrator Founding Member

    HEMPSTEAD, N.Y. - Former president Bill Clinton called Congress' impeachment of him an "egregious" abuse of the Constitution and challenged those who say history will judge him poorly because of his White House tryst with Monica Lewinsky.



    Speaking at an academic conference examining his presidency here Thursday, Clinton challenged historian Douglas Brinkley's comments in a newspaper interview that Clinton would be deemed a great president were it not for his impeachment.

    "I completely disagree with that," Clinton said in his speech at Hofstra University. "You can agree with that statement, but only if you think impeachment was justified. Otherwise, it was an egregious abuse of the Constitution and law and history of our country."

    Clinton was acquitted by the Senate of perjury and obstruction of justice at his 1999 impeachment trial, which he argued was not about what he called his "misconduct."

    "Now if you want to hold it against me that I did something wrong, that's a fair deal," he said. "If you do that, then you have a whole lot of other questions, which is how many other presidents do you have to downgrade and what are you going to do with all those Republican congressmen, you know, that had problems?"

    Clinton touted what he called the achievements of his eight-year presidency, from Middle East peace initiatives to turning around the U.S. economy.

    His remarks were cheered loudly by the audience.

    Clinton said his administration's failures included its slowness to act to halt the genocide in Rwanda and the decision to allow federal agents to raid a cult leader's compound in Waco, Texas. Nearly 80 cult followers died in a fire during the 1993 confrontation.

    "We should have waited them out," he said.

    The presidential conference is the 11th to be held at Hofstra; the first in 1982 examined the presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
     
  2. ghostrider

    ghostrider Resident Poltergeist Founding Member

    If perjury is OK, then why are the Dimmocrats whining so loudly for Libby's head? Or is perjury and obstruction of justice just OK if you're a Dimmocrat.
     
  3. Quigley_Sharps

    Quigley_Sharps The Badministrator Administrator Founding Member

    yup that seems to be it
     
  4. melbo

    melbo Hunter Gatherer Administrator Founding Member

    Quig, thjis would be the perfect place for the **Oh, nevermind** pic [peep]
     
  5. ghostrider

    ghostrider Resident Poltergeist Founding Member

    Some of the loudest defenders of Clinton are the ones crying for Rove to step down, too, so I guess even hypocrisy has a scale.
     
  6. Quigley_Sharps

    Quigley_Sharps The Badministrator Administrator Founding Member

    :shock:
    owneddamn0vy_989.
     
  7. melbo

    melbo Hunter Gatherer Administrator Founding Member

    that worx dawg...

    I was thinking ass blowout but it's prolly not appropriate

    Somewhere , someday
     
  8. Quigley_Sharps

    Quigley_Sharps The Badministrator Administrator Founding Member

    lol yeah last time i tosssed that one out Karl has to seek help.... b::
     
  9. melbo

    melbo Hunter Gatherer Administrator Founding Member

    [​IMG]
     
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary
1NTzCYzfQp3EJAGcxRodMHQMXm1u9pVTCT