Congress Helps Self to $3,100 Pay Raise

Discussion in 'Freedom and Liberty' started by martin97, Nov 20, 2005.

  1. martin97

    martin97 Fuel busted Trucker. Founding Member

    The Republican-controlled Congress helped itself to a $3,100 pay raise on Friday, then postponed work on bills to curb spending on social programs and cut taxes in favor of a two-week vacation.

    In the final hours of a tumultuous week in the Capitol, Democrats erupted in fury when House GOP leaders maneuvered toward a politically-charged vote _ and swift rejection _ of one war critic's call for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq. "You guys are pathetic, pathetic," Massachusetts Rep. Martin Meehan yelled across a noisy hall at Republicans.

    On another major issue, a renewal of the Patriot Act remained in limbo as an unlikely coalition of liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans sought curbs on the powers given law enforcement in the troubled first days after the 2001 terrorist attacks.

    Both the House and Senate were in session after midnight Thursday, working on the tax and deficit-cutting bills at the heart of the GOP agenda, before returning to work a few hours later.

    "What it does is start to turn down the escalating costs ... for our children and our grandchildren. One of the things that we cannot leave to that next generation is a huge deficit that they can't afford," House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said after enactment of a $50 billion deficit-reduction bill.

    Democrats dissented, with one eye on the 2006 elections.

    "The Republicans are taking food out of the mouths of children to give tax cuts to America's wealthiest. This is not a statement of America's values," said the Democratic leader, Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California. "Democrats believe that together, America can do better," she said, invoking the party's new campaign slogan.

    The cost-of-living increase for members of Congress _ which will put pay for the rank and file at an estimated $165,200 a year _ marked a brief truce in the pitched political battles that have flared in recent weeks on the war and domestic issues.

    So much so that the issue was not mentioned on the floor of either the House or Senate as lawmakers worked on legislation whose passage will assure bigger paychecks.

    Lawmakers automatically receive a cost of living increase each year, unless Congress votes to block it. By tradition, critics have tried to block increases by attaching a provision to the legislation that provides funding for the Treasury Department. One such attempt succeeded in the Senate earlier in the year, but the provision was omitted from the compromise measure moved toward final approval.

    The overall bill provided $140 billion for transportation, housing and other programs. It cleared the House on a vote of 392-31. Senate passage was by voice vote.

    Pay raise harmony aside, Republicans spent the day celebrating a party-line, post-midnight vote in which the House cleared legislation to reduce deficits by $50 billion over five years. The vote was 217-215, with all the Democrats who voted in opposition, along with 14 GOP rebels.

    Acting Majority Leader Roy Blunt of Missouri said Republicans would make their tax cut bill the top item on the agenda when lawmakers return to the Capitol in December.

    The House-passed measure attacks deficits by limiting spending for the first time in a decade on Medicaid, food stamps, student loans and other benefit programs that normally rise with inflation and eligibility.

    The House GOP leadership had hoped to clear the measure a week ago. It was forced to retreat when Republican moderates rebelled, even after Hastert agreed to strip out a controversial proposal to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling.

    The Senate-passed companion measure calls for less deficit reduction, $35 billion over five years, but includes the ANWR provision.

    The differences are expected to make it difficult for the House and Senate to reach a compromise by year's end, particularly since Republicans can't count on any Democratic support.

    The tax bill presents difficulties of its own for a GOP majority struggling to translate last fall's election gains into this year's legislative achievements.

    The Senate cleared a measure after 1:30 a.m. that calls for $60 billion in cuts over five years.

    The measure drew bipartisan support, passing on a vote of 64-33. Its provisions would continue a series of existing tax breaks that otherwise will expire, and shelters 14 million upper middle-income families from higher taxes.

    The White House has threatened a veto, citing a provision that raises taxes on oil companies.

    The House has yet to pass a companion measure. When it does, the tax on oil companies is unlikely to be included, and it is likely to be jettisoned before a compromise measure reaches the White House.

    Hastert said Republicans want to "make sure that we support our troops that are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan ... a lot of people say: Look, this is a tough time, we just ought to pull out and leave. We pull out and leave, we strand an effort to make sure that we can tamp down terrorism, to tamp down a dictatorship, that we can stabilize an area in the Middle East," he added.

    GOP aides conceded the last-minute maneuver was designed to put Democrats in a political squeeze _ voting for withdrawal and exposing themselves to attacks from the White House, or voting against it and risk angering the voters that polls show want an end to the conflict.

    Democrats angrily attacked the GOP move, then lined up with Republicans to vote against a troop withdrawal in hopes of draining the issue of its political significance. The vote was 403-3 against the measure.

    Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., called the measure "a piece of garbage" and an attack on Rep. John Murtha. The Pennsylvania Democrat, a decorated veteran and respected congressional voice on military matters, said Thursday it was time for the troops to come home.

    House and Senate negotiators announced a tentative agreement earlier in the week to pass a seven-year extension of the Patriot Act. Key senators lawmakers involved in the talks balked at the terms, and officials said they would resume compromise efforts when Congress returns to work in December.

  2. ghrit

    ghrit Bad company Administrator Founding Member

    If I remember right, the average salary of those toads is around 165K. If so, then the COLA raise is just under 2%. Unnoticable to them, so why bother? Which is, of course your point. I'll take the 2% of what I make, willingly. Probably will come in handy on the electric bill this winter.

    Notice, it is COLA, not merit.
  3. melbo

    melbo Hunter Gatherer Administrator Founding Member

    I don't give my guys a COLA, and I don't get a COLA for my homes yet... Nor do I get a an adjustment for the extra cost I pay on Steel, materials and that 10% increase accress the board that each of my suppliers has stated in their letters.

    I think in a year like this, a COLA for Senators sounds worse than in other years...

    Hell, I don't give myself a COLA and I can write my salary at whatever I want. ;)
  4. monkeyman

    monkeyman Monkey+++ Moderator Emeritus Founding Member

    Hell, my accounting has to get creative just to buy cola! I want to be a senator, but I just dont lie well enouph. ;)
  5. Valkman

    Valkman Knifemaker Moderator Emeritus Founding Member

    I've been on disablity for almost 6 years and my pay is set from the time I left - no raises ever. You really notice that it buys less and less as everything goes up.

    What Congress did doesn't suprise me in the least - they're not there to help the people but themselves as much as possible.
  6. Cousin Jack

    Cousin Jack Knifemaker Founding Member

    If it were up to me....

    Congress-critters, in an effort to "stay in touch" with the average American citizen, would only be given a yearly salary equal to that of an average American.

    They (our congress-critters) would not receive a pension or medical insurance after leaving office.

    Finally, each and every person holding office would be held for trial by a panel of citizens after their time of office had been served. They (congress-critters) would all be tried in an effort to determine if any vote, motion, or act of theirs during their time of service resulted in a transgression against the Constitution of the united States of America, and thus against the People of this land. If found guilty, the punishment would be commensurative to the charges they were found guilty of...treason being the highest of offenses.

    If these "rules of leadership" were to be inacted tomorrow, I would highly suggest investing in any company that manufactured rope
survivalmonkey SSL seal warrant canary