Global Warming, what Global Warming?

It's a scam but even if it was not. The cold has always kill more people than heat and 90% of life on earth is in the 1/3 of the planet that makes up the center or warmest parts of the earth. More warm places would mean more life on earth not less.


Funny the ways to fix it is to give up all your freedom.

 

Let's see:

* Warmer weather = longer growing season
* More CO2 = better for growing plants / give us more O2 from the plants for us to breath
* Not so cold = don't have to use as much energy for heat in winter. Air conditioning is a luxury, heat is a necessity at a certain point.
* Probably just a lie created by the tyrants who would be king anyway so why worry about stuff ya can't fix.

Cows fart, they always have

The world turns,

Man (at least some of those fellers that think they know how to tell the rest of us how we gotta live) has a heck of a lot of hubris thinking that he can impact something what has been doing fine since the good Lord made it.

The truth is that We may impact local things, but the world is self healing, and regulating.

The moment it stops being that way man won't be able to turn in on, anymore than he can turn it off.

Besides which, Busybody is just not the way to live yer life.

 

I do not believe potential belongs in that sentence.

 

Hot off the presses. You just have to love the way this will pound salt up Al Gores a$$. As I have said since day one, Man is not significant when compared to Mother Nature and the Sun with regard to "SUN CYCLES GLOBAL TEMPERATURE CHANGES"!!!
.
Greenpeace Co-Founder: 'No Scientific Proof' of Manmade Global Warming
In eye-opening testimony before a Senate subcommittee, the co-founder of the environmental activist group Greenpeace refuted assertions that carbon dioxide emissions from human activity are responsible for global warming.
He also said a warmer temperature would be "far better" than a cooler one.
Patrick Moore, Ph.D., testified before the Senate Environmental and Public Works Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight on Feb. 25.
"There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth's atmosphere over the past 100 years," said Moore, who left Greenpeace in 1986 due to what he called its "sharp turn to the political left."
"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states: 'It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming' since the mid-20th century.
"'Extremely likely' is not a scientific term but rather a judgment, as in a court of law."
Moore, chairman emeritus of Greenspirit Strategies in Vancouver, Canada, also told the subcommittee: "Perhaps the simplest way to expose the fallacy of ‘extreme certainty’ is to look at the historical record. When modern life evolved over 500 million years ago, CO2 was more than 10 times higher than today, yet life flourished at this time. Then an ice age occurred 450 million years ago when CO2 was 10 times higher than today.
"The fact that we had both higher temperatures and an ice age at a time when CO2 emissions were 10 times higher than they are today fundamentally contradicts the certainty that human-caused CO2 emissions are the main cause of global warming.
"The increase in temperature between 1910 and 1940 was virtually identical to the increase between 1970 and 2000. Yet the IPCC does not attribute the increase from 1910-1940 to 'human influence.' They are clear in their belief that human emissions impact only the increase since the mid-20th century. Why does the IPCC believe that a virtually identical increase in temperature after 1950 is caused mainly by 'human influence,' when it has no explanation for the nearly identical increase from 1910-1940?"
Moore went on to say: "Today, we live in an unusually cold period in the history of life on earth and there is no reason to believe that a warmer climate would be anything but beneficial for humans and the majority of other species. There is ample reason to believe that a sharp cooling of the climate would bring disastrous results for human civilization.
"It is 'extremely likely' that a warmer temperature than today's would be far better than a cooler one."