1. The Topic of the Month for October is "Make this the Perfect Bugout Location". Please join the discussion in the TOTM forum.

Got Nukes

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Yard Dart, Apr 1, 2016.

  1. Yard Dart

    Yard Dart Vigilant Monkey..... Moderator Site Supporter++

    Russia Doubling Nuclear Warheads
    New multiple-warhead missiles to break arms treaty limit

    Russia is doubling the number of its strategic nuclear warheads on new missiles by deploying multiple reentry vehicles that have put Moscow over the limit set by the New START arms treaty, according to Pentagon officials.

    A recent intelligence assessment of the Russian strategic warhead buildup shows that the increase is the result of the addition of multiple, independently targetable reentry vehicles, or MIRVs, on recently deployed road-mobile SS-27 and submarine-launched SS-N-32 missiles, said officials familiar with reports of the buildup.

    “The Russians are doubling their warhead output,” said one official. “They will be exceeding the New START [arms treaty] levels because of MIRVing these new systems.”

    The 2010 treaty requires the United States and Russia to reduce deployed warheads to 1,550 warheads by February 2018.

    The United States has cut its warhead stockpiles significantly in recent years. Moscow, however, has increased its numbers of deployed warheads and new weapons.

    The State Department revealed in January that Russia currently has exceeded the New START warhead limit by 98 warheads, deploying a total number of 1,648 warheads. The U.S. level currently is below the treaty level at 1,538 warheads.

    Officials said that in addition to adding warheads to the new missiles, Russian officials have sought to prevent U.S. weapons inspectors from checking warheads as part of the 2010 treaty.

    The State Department, however, said it can inspect the new MIRVed missiles.

    Disclosure of the doubling of Moscow’s warhead force comes as world leaders gather in Washington this week to discus nuclear security—but without Russian President Vladimir Putin, who skipped the conclave in an apparent snub of the United States.

    The Nuclear Security Summit is the latest meeting of world leaders seeking to pursue President Obama’s 2009 declaration of a world without nuclear arms.

    Russia, however, is embarked on a major strategic nuclear forces build-up under Putin. Moscow is building new road-mobile, rail-mobile, and silo-based intercontinental-range missiles, along with new submarines equipped with modernized missiles. A new long-range bomber is also being built.

    SS-N 30

    “Russia’s modernization program and their nuclear deterrent force is of concern,” Adm. Cecil Haney, commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, which is in charge of nuclear forces, told Congress March 10.

    “When you look at what they’ve been modernizing, it didn’t just start,” Haney said. “They’ve been doing this quite frankly for some time with a lot of crescendo of activity over the last decade and a half.”

    By contrast, the Pentagon is scrambling to find funds to pay for modernizing aging U.S. nuclear forces after seven years of sharp defense spending cuts under Obama.

    Earlier this month, Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Congress that Russia continues to pose the greatest threat to the United States.

    “The one that has the greatest capability and poses the greatest threat to the United States is Russia because of its capabilities—its nuclear capability, its cyber capability, and clearly because of some of the things we have seen in its leadership behavior over the last couple of years,” Dunford said.

    In addition to a large-scale nuclear buildup, Russia has upgraded its nuclear doctrine and its leaders and officials have issued numerous threats to use nuclear arms against the United States in recent months, compounding fears of a renewed Russian threat.

    Blake Narendra, spokesman for the State Department’s arms control, verification, and compliance bureau, said the Russian warhead build-up is the result of normal fluctuations due to modernization prior to the compliance deadline.

    “The Treaty has no interim limits,” Narendra told the Free Beacon. “We fully expect Russia to meet the New START treaty central limits in accordance with the stipulated timeline of February 2018. The treaty provides that by that date both sides must have no more than 700 deployed treaty-limited delivery vehicles and 1,550 deployed warheads.”

    Both the United States and Russia continue to implement the treaty in “a business-like manner,” he added.

    Mark Schneider, a former Pentagon official involved in strategic nuclear forces, however, said he has warned for years that Russia is not reducing its nuclear forces under the treaty.

    Since the New START arms accord, Moscow has eliminated small numbers of older SS-25 road-mobile missiles. But the missiles were replaced with new multiple-warhead SS-27s.

    SS-27 Mod 2

    “The Russians have not claimed to have made any reductions for five years,” Schneider said

    Additionally, Russian officials deceptively sought to make it appear their nuclear forces have been reduced during a recent nuclear review conference.

    “If they could have claimed to have made any reductions under New START counting rules they would have done it there,” Schneider said.

    The Obama administration also has been deceptive about the benefits of New START.

    “The administration public affairs talking points on New START reductions border on outright lies,” Schneider said.

    “The only reductions that have been made since New START entry into force have been by the United States,” he said. “Instead, Russia has moved from below the New START limits to above the New START limits in deployed warheads and deployed delivery vehicles.”

    Deployment of new multiple-warhead SS-27s and SS-N-32s are pushing up the Russian warhead numbers. Published Russian reports have stated the missiles will be armed with 10 warheads each.

    Former Defense Secretary William Perry said Thursday that New START was “very helpful” in promoting strategic stability but that recent trends in nuclear weapons are “very, very bad.”

    “When President Obama made his speech in Prague, I thought we were really set for major progress in this field [disarmament],” Perry said in remarks at the Atlantic Council.

    However, Russian “hostility” to the United States ended the progress. “Everything came to a grinding halt and we’re moving in reverse,” Perry said.

    Other nuclear powers that are expanding their arsenals include China and Pakistan, Perry said.

    Perry urged further engagement with Russia on nuclear weapons. “We do have a common interest in preventing a nuclear catastrophe,” he said.

    Perry is advocating that the United States unilaterally eliminate all its land-based missiles and rely instead on nuclear missile submarines and bombers for deterrence.

    However, he said his advocacy of the policy “may be pursuing a mission impossible.”

    “I highly doubt the Russians would follow suit” by eliminating their land-based missiles, the former secretary said.

    Additionally, Moscow is building a new heavy ICBM called Sarmat, code-named SS-X-30 by the Pentagon, that will be equipped with between 10 and 15 warheads per missile. And a new rail-based ICBM is being developed that will also carry multiple warheads.

    Another long-range missile, called the SS-X-31, is under development and will carry up to 12 warheads.

    Schneider, the former Pentagon official, said senior Russian arms officials have been quoted in press reports discussing Moscow’s withdrawal from the New START arms accord. If that takes place, Russia will have had six and a half years to prepare to violate the treaty limits, at the same time the United States will have reduced its forces to treaty limits.

    “Can they comply with New START? Yes. They can download their missile warheads and do a small number to delivery systems reductions,” Schneider said. “Will they? I doubt it. If they don’t start to do something very soon they are likely to pull the plug on the treaty. I don’t see them uploading the way they have, only to download in the next two years.”

    The White House said Moscow’s failure to take part in the nuclear summit was a sign of self-isolation based on the West’s sanctions aimed at punishing Russia for the military takeover of Ukraine’s Crimea.

    A Russian official said the snub by Putin was directed at Obama.

    “This summit is particularly important for the USA and for Obama—this is probably why Moscow has decided to go for this gesture and show its outrage with the West’s policy in this manner,” Alexei Arbatov, director of the Center for International Security at the Russian Academy of Sciences, told the business newspaper Vedomosti.

    A Russian Foreign Ministry official, Mikhail Ulyanov, told RIA Novosti that the summit was not needed.

    “There is no need for it, to be honest,” he said, adding that nuclear security talks should be the work of nuclear physicists, intelligence services, and engineers.

    “The political agenda of the summits has long been exhausted,” Ulyanov said.
    Russia Doubling Nuclear Warheads
    Meat and Seepalaces like this.
  2. Altoidfishfins

    Altoidfishfins Monkey++

    This is what happens when our country elects a president with no spine - twice
    Meat, Tikka, Seepalaces and 1 other person like this.
  3. Seepalaces

    Seepalaces Monkey Site Supporter+

    I understand that Obama said that "a nuclear terrorist attack would change the world" yesterday. Yeah, that guy's the leader of the free world. Terrific...
    Meat, Altoidfishfins and Tikka like this.
  4. enloopious

    enloopious Rocket Surgeon

    Just so you know, he is not just saying, he is telling his buddies what is going to happen. WHEN this happens it will change the world into a new world order proper the way we have all been talking about for years. Russia will nuke us and Obama will stand down.
  5. Motomom34

    Motomom34 Moderator Moderator Site Supporter++

    Well from the looks of the pictures coming from the Nuclear Summit, I do not think our leader considers nuclear security a serious matter. Our President is a joke. What an embarrassment.

    Peace out, fools! Obama flashes peace sign at nuclear security summit

    Look at that. The world leaders less Putin and our joker is front dead center flashing the peace sign. All I feel is disgust.
  6. Tikka

    Tikka Monkey+++

    0bama is showing his butt as usual.
    Seepalaces and Meat like this.
  7. Altoidfishfins

    Altoidfishfins Monkey++

    0bama does not like to or want to deal with foreign issues. He wants to concentrate on domestic policy, such as influencing the direction of this country ever further to the left.
    Seepalaces likes this.
  8. kellory

    kellory An unemployed Jester, is nobody's fool. Banned

    The man has no dignity. He is just a useless clown.
    oldawg, Seepalaces and Meat like this.
  9. Meat

    Meat Monkey+

    One of these folks could be the Anti-Christ. (Let the jokes begin) :D
    Motomom34 and Seepalaces like this.
  10. Tikka

    Tikka Monkey+++

    In addition, he lacks ethics and honor. He is the worst nightmare; a gutless weakling in charge.
    kellory likes this.
  1. Bandit99
  2. UncleMorgan
  3. Yard Dart
  4. DarkLight
  5. AD1
  6. winston
  7. Yard Dart
  8. CATO
  9. Yard Dart
  10. RightHand
  11. Yard Dart
  12. melbo
  13. Gopherman
  14. Ajax
  15. E.L.
  16. melbo
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary