Civics H.R.2546 - Firearm Risk Protection Act of 2015

Discussion in 'Freedom and Liberty' started by Ganado, Aug 8, 2015.


Tags:
  1. Ganado

    Ganado Monkey+++

    H.R.2546 - 114th Congress (2015-2016): Firearm Risk Protection Act of 2015 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

    Shown Here:
    Introduced in House (05/21/2015)

    Firearm Risk Protection Act of 2015

    Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to: (1) prohibit the purchase or sale of a firearm unless the purchaser presents proof to the seller and the seller verifies that the purchaser is covered by a qualified liability insurance policy, and (2) require any person who purchases a firearm on or after this Act's effective date to be covered by such a policy. Exempts the purchase or sale of a firearm for use by a federal, state, or local agency.

    Defines "qualified liability insurance policy" to mean a policy that: (1) provides liability insurance covering the purchaser specifically for losses resulting from use of the firearm while it is owned by the purchaser, and (2) is issued by an insurer licensed or authorized to provide the coverage by the state in which the purchaser resides.

    This really pisses me off
     
  2. mysterymet

    mysterymet Monkey+++

    All D sponsors. This is bill is ridiculous and going nowhere fast.
     
    Yard Dart, pearlselby and Brokor like this.
  3. BlueDuck

    BlueDuck Monkey

    More liberal crap. They never give up. They are just hoping maybe this time it will stick.
     
    Yard Dart and Brokor like this.
  4. Altoidfishfins

    Altoidfishfins Monkey++

    Sounds as if it was introduced by the insurance companies looking to make a buck.
     
    Yard Dart and Ganado like this.
  5. Dunerunner

    Dunerunner Monkey

    So all the criminals who steal, trade drugs or a night with their girl friend or their car that wasn't insured for a gun, are going to run right out and buy liability insurance.

    I'm beginning to wonder if these folks have a thought process....
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2015
  6. techsar

    techsar Monkey+++

    Don't wonder too long...you're just wasting time ;)
     
    Yard Dart, pearlselby and oldawg like this.
  7. Brokor

    Brokor Live Free or Cry Moderator Site Supporter+++ Founding Member

    Stupid Liberal scum.

    "...SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!"


    Our Constitutionally protected rights are supported by millions of gun owning patriots across America. TRY IT.
     
  8. Ganado

    Ganado Monkey+++

    It's the little chipping away at liberty that bugs me. Just like chigger bites. I think we need some liberal insecticide
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2015
  9. kellory

    kellory An unemployed Jester, is nobody's fool. Banned

    It is a defacto gun registry.
     
    Yard Dart and pearlselby like this.
  10. Gopherman

    Gopherman Sometimes I Wish I Could Go Back to Sleep Site Supporter++

    I refer back to the "Brass Rat" post![LMAO]
     
    Ganado and kellory like this.
  11. kellory

    kellory An unemployed Jester, is nobody's fool. Banned

    Got one?
     
  12. Brokor

    Brokor Live Free or Cry Moderator Site Supporter+++ Founding Member

    pearlselby, Yard Dart and Mountainman like this.
  13. UncleMorgan

    UncleMorgan I eat vegetables. My friends are not vegetables.

    This is a very dangerous bill. If they manage to pass it they'll be able dictate the amount of insurance each gun owner must carry. And they'll pick a suitably large number for their agenda--like a $million+ in liability per firearm.
     
    Ganado likes this.
  14. Ganado

    Ganado Monkey+++

    The bill actually says the insurance co. Can determine the appropriate amount
     
    pearlselby likes this.
  15. Brokor

    Brokor Live Free or Cry Moderator Site Supporter+++ Founding Member

    ---Does not apply to a sovereign citizen---

    (but it will be enforced by men in black with guns)
     
    Ganado, Mountainman and Yard Dart like this.
  16. Ganado

    Ganado Monkey+++

    Brokor my experience with the whole 'soverign' citizen movement is two fold

    1 most people don't know how to structure themselves legally speaking, to get soverign,

    2 the people who get the structure right think it's a one time event rather than a life style to manage. .. and because laws change it does take a lot to manage the details. I can't count the number of people who have gotten fouled up with one or more federal or state agencies because they didn't keep records or do their home work.
     
    Tobit likes this.
  17. Dont

    Dont Just another old gray Jarhead Monkey Site Supporter

    It truly is sad that one must prove that they are "sovereign" to remain sovereign to those that are our servants..
     
  18. Ganado

    Ganado Monkey+++

    @Dont. I agree with you sentiment and there were laws passed that at the time the common man did not understand the implication. They didn't 'take away' our sovereignty. No one can do that. But many people have been 'enticed' into the system and to opt out takes some finagling. When you opt out, the legal language matters. Alot! It is alot to manage and you run the risk of getting crossways with the system in places you didn't even know about.

    So you really need to consider the risk vs reward of living soverign... legally speaking
     
    vonslob, Yard Dart and Dont like this.
  1. Yard Dart
  2. Yard Dart
  3. GOG
  4. chimo
  5. Yard Dart
  6. bmtm09
  7. AD1
  8. Yard Dart
  9. Legion489
  10. marlas1too
  11. AD1
  12. Salted Weapon
  13. Mindgrinder
  14. ColtCarbine
  15. stg58
  16. enloopious
  17. Legion489
  18. 3M-TA3
  19. Legion489
  20. Legion489
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary
17282WuJHksJ9798f34razfKbPATqTq9E7