Invisible Ink Tattoo for vaccine

3M-TA3 · Jun 27, 2020

mysterymet said: ↑

I am not anti vax by any means. Uncle Sugar gave me a shot record 2 pages long in single spaced 10 point font. I have my kids vaccinated. However, I am VERY against the .gov “branding” my children. I don’t care that it is “invisible ink” that supposedly goes away in 5 years. I will just maintain paper records, thank you very much!
Click to expand...

Exactly. I'm not anti vax, I'm anti branding. The precedent of "your body doesn't belong to you" is the dangerous part and it doesn't take much thought to see where that will lead.

Gator 45/70 · Jun 27, 2020

Thinking this dude here is a major source of........Liveleak.com - Bill Gates, a candid moment on his retirement hobbies.

oldawg · Jun 27, 2020

They don't give a rat's patootie about a vaccination, but they DO care about branding the sheep.

ghrit · Jun 27, 2020

oldawg said: ↑

They don't give a rat's patootie about a vaccination, but they DO care about branding the sheep.
Click to expand...

Gotta think that the brands will be different so the overlords will know their own when it comes time to distribute the herds.

oil pan 4 · Jun 27, 2020

Remember the last group that mandated children be tattooed...

chelloveck · Jun 28, 2020

oil pan 4 said: ↑

Remember the last group that mandated children be tattooed...
Click to expand...

Tattooing and branding men , women and children has a long history...it's not a relatively recent concept....but then again, masters were then free to mark their chattel property as they wished.

"...Though tattooing words and symbols on human bodies has become increasingly popular in recent decades, it is not a new practice. African and African-American slaves routinely had the initials or other identifying indicia of their slave masters permanently branded on their skin.29 These involuntary “trademarks” were placed on slaves both for purposes of punishment and identification.30 Prior to the passage of state and federal trademark law, slave owners used trademarks as a way to distinguish their human property from the property of other slave masters. Branding as a mechanism for distinguishing human property began in 2000-1800 B.C. with Babylonian slaves.31 Within the Transatlantic slave trade, the practice dates back to at least as early as the 1440s..."

"...The use of branding significantly decreased after the United States and England made the importation of African slaves illegal in 1807 and 1808, but it was revived after the illegal slave trade in the American South, Brazil, and Cuba became commonplace.35 Frederick Douglass described the process of American slave branding in 1846 in England: “[a] person was tied to a post, and his back, or such other part as was to be branded, laid bare; the iron was then delivered red hot (sensation), and applied to the quivering flesh, imprinting upon it the name of the monster who claimed the slave.”36

Of course, modern trademark law did not exist during this era, but Anglo-American law recognized the use of trademarks to identify and distinguish goods in the marketplace as early as the sixteenth century.37 It is clear that slave owners used trademark-like branding to identify certain slaves as their property and ensure that others could not claim ownership over those slaves.38 In one 1838 advertisement for a runaway slave, the slave’s owner, Micajah Ricks of North Carolina, stated that “the woman is tall and black, and a few days before she went off, I burnt her with a hot iron on the left side of her face; I tried to make the letter M . . . .”39 This “M” presumably represented the slave owner’s first name, “Micajah.” Similarly, a slave owner from Kentucky was documented as stating that his slave, Jane, bore his “brand mark on the breast something like L blotched.”40

In this way, slave owners used their own identifying indicia and trademarks to distinguish their slaves from others and indicate to whom those slaves belonged. The Thirteenth Amendment, of course, abolished slavery and its related practices in 1865.41 Roughly five years later, in 1870, Congress enacted the first federal trademark statute.42..."
Click to expand...

https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1216&context=mttlr

Until relatively recent times, when celebrities were to be seen more commonly wearing tatts, tattoos were mostly only seen on soldiers, sailors, and underworld identities. I don't favour tattoos...visible or invisible

Oddcaliber · Jun 28, 2020

Don't have any tattoos myself unless I can join the Yakuza.

Meat · Jun 28, 2020

Topics like this do make me ponder other practices that are considered acceptable yet..........I’ll never forget that silent scream from the boy, “Breathe son for Pete’s sake. You’ll thank us later in the high school locker room!”

arleigh · Jun 28, 2020

I came with fingerprints and DNA my personality and body build, that is all I need to identify my self as an individual.
As an aside note, God forbid His priests to have tattoos and ceremoniously cutting themselves as the pagan priests were known for.
Tattoos IMO deface devalue the person. want to wear a picture on your self, use a T-shirt.

BTPost · Jun 28, 2020

arleigh said: ↑

As an aside note, God forbid His priests to have tattoos and ceremoniously cutting themselves as the pagan priests were known for.
Click to expand...

Reminds me one of my favorite Bible Stories... Elijah & The Priests of Baal.....

oil pan 4 · Jun 28, 2020

Remember the fbi has nailed some rioting arsonists because they identified them by their tats.

chelloveck · Jun 28, 2020

arleigh said: ↑

I came with fingerprints and DNA my personality and body build, that is all I need to identify my self as an individual.
As an aside note, God forbid His priests to have tattoos and ceremoniously cutting themselves as the pagan priests were known for.
Tattoos IMO deface devalue the person. want to wear a picture on your self, use a T-shirt.
Click to expand...

No brand is brand differentiation in the case of ancient Israelites....just a way of identifying an in-group from an out group.

Body modification is a matter of personal taste...and provided that it is not compulsory or coerced...that is a private matter, and a private decision. By the ways...the ancient , and not so ancient Jews also have a cultural version of branding...at least as far as males are concerned...I thought God did not abide "ceremonious cutting"...A sign of divine inconsistency?

Log in or Sign up

Invisible Ink Tattoo for vaccine

3M-TA3 Cold Wet Monkey

Gator 45/70 Monkey+++

oldawg Monkey+++

ghrit Bad company Administrator Founding Member

oil pan 4 Monkey+++

chelloveck Diabolus Causidicus

Oddcaliber Monkey+++

Meat Monkey+++

arleigh Goophy monkey

BTPost Stumpy Old Fart,Deadman Walking, Snow Monkey Moderator

oil pan 4 Monkey+++

chelloveck Diabolus Causidicus

Vaccination: History

New TB vaccine shows promise, but there is a catch

Getting vaccinations is prepping.

Flu Shot Dangerous Vaccine Vaccine Court

Who is testing the vaccines

German Fed. Sup. Court: Measles Virus Does Not Exist.

Jerry Brown signs bill requiring childhood vaccinations

Medicine Science Study Confirms No Link Between MMR Vaccine and Autism

New DARPA project aims to make vaccines obsolete

MERS- Middle East Respiratory Syndrome

new technology out for vaccines/antibiotics

Vaccine effectiveness and Merck

vaccines are completely safe

New: H3N2 virus.....

vacination & Your children

a very interseting read !!

Flu Avian Flu vaccine

Invisible Ink Tattoo for vaccine

3M-TA3 Cold Wet Monkey

Gator 45/70 Monkey+++

oldawg Monkey+++

ghrit Bad company Administrator Founding Member

oil pan 4 Monkey+++

chelloveck Diabolus Causidicus

Oddcaliber Monkey+++

Meat Monkey+++

arleigh Goophy monkey

BTPost Stumpy Old Fart,Deadman Walking, Snow Monkey Moderator

oil pan 4 Monkey+++

chelloveck Diabolus Causidicus

Useful Searches