just who owns YOUR stuff anyway?

Discussion in 'Freedom and Liberty' started by CATO, Mar 19, 2013.


  1. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

    Forget the Cellphone Fight — We Should Be Allowed to Unlock Everything We Own | Wired Opinion | Wired.com

    unlockingcellphone-hughmacleod-660x518.
    Image: Hugh MacLeod / gapingvoid ltd
    While Congress is working on legislation to re-legalize cellphone unlocking, let’s acknowledge the real issue: The copyright laws that made unlocking illegal in the first place. Who owns our stuff? The answer used to be obvious. Now, with electronics integrated into just about everything we buy, the answer has changed.
    We live in a digital age, and even the physical goods we buy are complex. Copyright is impacting more people than ever before because the line between hardware and software, physical and digital has blurred.
    The issue goes beyond cellphone unlocking, because once we buy an object — any object — we should own it. We should be able to lift the hood, unlock it, modify it, repair it … without asking for permission from the manufacturer.
    But we really don’t own our stuff anymore (at least not fully); the manufacturers do. Because modifying modern objects requires access to information: code, service manuals, error codes, and diagnostic tools. Modern cars are part horsepower, part high-powered computer. Microwave ovens are a combination of plastic and microcode. Silicon permeates and powers almost everything we own.
    This is a property rights issue, and current copyright law gets it backwards, turning regular people — like students, researchers, and small business owners — into criminals. Fortune 500 telecom manufacturer Avaya, for example, is known for suing service companies, accusing them of violating copyright for simply using a password to log in to their phone systems. That’s right: typing in a password is considered “reproducing copyrighted material.”
    Manufacturers have systematically used copyright in this manner over the past 20 years to limit our access to information. Technology has moved too fast for copyright laws to keep pace, so corporations have been exploiting the lag to create information monopolies at our expense and for their profit. After years of extensions and so-called improvements, copyright has turned Mickey Mouse into a monster who can never die.

    kylewiens_wiredopinion.
    Kyle Wiens
    Kyle Wiens is the co-founder and CEO of iFixit, an online repair community and parts retailer internationally renowned for their open source repair manuals and product teardowns. Launched out of his Cal Poly college dorm room in 2003, iFixit has now empowered upwards of 15 million people to repair their broken stuff.
    op-bug-bg-bottom.
    It hasn’t always been that way. Copyright laws were originally designed to protect creativity and promote innovation. But now, they are doing exactly the opposite: They’re being used to keep independent shops from fixing new cars. They’re making it almost impossible for farmers to maintain their equipment. And, as we’ve seen in the past few weeks, they’re preventing regular people from unlocking their own cellphones.
    This isn’t an issue that only affects the digerati; farmers are bearing the brunt as well. Kerry Adams, a family farmer in Santa Maria, California, recently bought two transplanter machines for north of $100,000 apiece. They broke down soon afterward, and he had to fly a factory technician out to fix them.
    Because manufacturers have copyrighted the service manuals, local mechanics can’t fix modern equipment. And today’s equipment — packed with sensors and electronics — is too complex to repair without them. That’s a problem for farmers, who can’t afford to pay the dealer’s high maintenance fees for fickle equipment.
    Adams gave up on getting his transplanters fixed; it was just too expensive to keep flying technicians out to his farm. Now, the two transplanters sit idle, and he can’t use them to support his farm and his family.
    This isn’t an issue that only affects the digerati.
    God may have made a farmer, but copyright law doesn’t let him make a living.
    Neighborhood car mechanics also see copyright as a noose constricting their ability to fix problems. The error codes in your car? Protected. The diagnostic tools used to access them? Proprietary software.
    New cars get more sophisticated every year, and mechanics need access to service information to stay in business. Under the cover of copyright law, auto companies have denied independent shops access to the diagnostic tools and service diagrams they need.
    Fixing our cars, tractors, and cellphones should have nothing to do with copyright.
    Mechanics aren’t taking it lying down. In September of last year, Massachusetts passed Right to Repair legislation designed to level the playing field between dealerships and independent repair shops. Under the rallying cry of “it’s your car, you should be able to repair it where you want,” voters passed the bill by a whopping 86 percent margin. The law circumvents copyright, requiring manufacturers to release all service information to Massachusetts car owners and service technicians. The popular unrest is spreading: Legislators in Maine just introduced similar legislation.
    Meanwhile, progress is being made to legalize cellphone unlocking. With grassroots groups leading the charge, the Obama administration announced its support for overturning the ban last week. Since then, members of Congress have authored no fewer than four bills to legalize unlocking.
    This is a step in the right direction, but it’s not enough. Let’s make one thing clear: Fixing our cars, tractors, and cellphones should have nothing to do with copyright.
    As long as Congress focuses on just unlocking cellphones, they’re missing the larger point. Senators could pass a hundred unlocking bills; five years from now large companies will find some other copyright claim to limit consumer choice. To really solve the problem, Congress must enact meaningful copyright reform. The potential economic benefits are significant, as free information creates jobs. Service information is freely available online for many smartphones from iFixit (my organization) and other websites. Not coincidentally, thousands of cellphone repair businesses have sprung up in recent years, using the repair knowledge to keep broken cellphones out of landfills.
    As long as we’re limited in our ability to modify and repair things, copyright — for all objects — will discourage creativity. It will cost us money. It will cost us jobs. And it’s already costing us our freedom.
     
  2. Brokor

    Brokor Live Free or Cry Moderator Site Supporter+++ Founding Member

    Yessir, massa. Iza jus go an' pick some mo' cotton fro tha field fo' ya, massa. [shiz]
     
  3. kckndrgn

    kckndrgn Moderator Moderator Founding Member

    I believe it should not take an act of congress (federal or state) to allow for "unlocking" or "rooting" anything, or having access to the technology to fix something you have purchased.
    Just like when VHS came out it was ruled you could make copies for "back-up" and home use only. Fine, I'm cool with that. Now we have DVD and Blu-Ray discs and it's been ruled that the production companies can "lock" the content to prevent "unauthorized" copying. Really? it seems my family scratches, beyond repair, 2-3 DVD or Blu-Ray discs each year. If I was able to make a copy, it would be the copy that is kept out for playing not the original, so now, just like the production companies want, if I want to replace that disk, I have to BUY it again. Oh JOY!
     
    Tracy likes this.
  4. CATO

    CATO Monkey+++

  5. William Antrum

    William Antrum GunMetal Monkey

    What illegal? I unlocked mine 2 years ago opppppsssssssssssssssssssssss
     
  6. Mindgrinder

    Mindgrinder Karma Pirate Ninja Jedi Bipolar WINNING M.L.F.

    but i thought of it first so its my intellectual property. i OWN that thought and nobody else can use it for the duration of my entire life + 70 years after i die.
    Kellory thinks this whole copyright thing is great...granted he's still waiting to have a profitable thought and calling downloaders "theives".

    Copyright reform?
    Sure - 5 year max or totally abolish it.
    Paying many thousands of dollars for "educational" college/university books is absurd.
     
  7. techsar

    techsar Monkey+++

    Nope, nope, nope. They (the manufacturers) may charge for the info, but it has not been denied to independent shops.
     
  8. VHestin

    VHestin Farm Chick

    That to me is one of the downsides of technology, it only appears to make things easier, until the equipment breaks down, and then it's hell to fix...I'm not a Luddite by any means, but for the most part, I only use electronic/technological stuff for entertainment or communication.
     
  9. kellory

    kellory An unemployed Jester, is nobody's fool. Banned

    If you had proven it to be your original idea,(it must be recorded as proof or record) then you might have a case. As it is, you are just farting into the wind.
    Copy Rights, and patents, protect those with an original thought, from those without a clue. Make your own way.
     
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary
17282WuJHksJ9798f34razfKbPATqTq9E7