Kellogg to raise nutrition of kids' food

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Clyde, Jun 15, 2007.

  1. Clyde

    Clyde Jet Set Tourer Administrator Founding Member

    By MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN, Associated Press Writer Thu Jun 14, 7:51 AM ET
    WASHINGTON - Kellogg Co., the world's largest cereal maker, has agreed to raise the nutritional value of cereals and snacks it markets to children.
    The Battle Creek, Mich., company avoided a lawsuit threatened by parents and nutrition advocacy groups worried about increasing child obesity (How about "don't buy this crap fro your kids? If you don't buy it, they won't make it or they will increase the nutritional value.). Kellogg intends to formally announce its decision Thursday.
    The company said it won't promote foods in TV, radio, print or Web site ads that reach audiences at least half of whom are under age 12 unless a single serving of the product meets these standards (Great, limit the free market. Sell your Kellogs stock now! I hate these ****ing advocacy lawsuit ambulance chasing ****ers):
    _No more than 200 calories.
    _No trans fat and no more than 2 grams of saturated fat.
    _No more than 230 milligrams of sodium, except for Eggo frozen waffles.
    _No more than 12 grams of sugar, not counting sugar from fruit, dairy and vegetables.
    Kellogg said it would reformulate products to meet these criteria or stop marketing them to children under 12 by the end of 2008.
    "By committing to these nutrition standards and marketing reforms, Kellogg has vaulted over the rest of the food industry," said Michael F. Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest (Thanks your ****ing richard licker. How about but the **** out of our lives so we can liver free. Note to self liquidate faster). "This commitment means that parents will find it a little easier to steer their children toward healthy food choices — especially if other food manufacturers and broadcasters follow Kellogg's lead." (AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH you stupid ****ing the ****ing label. This shit is full of sugar. I only takes one damn bite for you to figure this out. What is wrong with this country. Better step up the consolidation, Clyde!)
    Jacobson's nutrition advocacy group, along with two Massachusetts parents and the Boston-based Campaign For A Commercial-Free Childhood (WTF. I have have a new campaign.....Campaign for a Idiot-Free Life -- If your dumb you die!), had served notice in January 2006 of intent to sue Kellogg and the Nickelodeon cable TV network under a Massachusetts law to stop them from marketing junk food to kids. (I propose a Massachusets law. Parents must read the labels of all food an be held accountable for what they and their children lift with their hand, place in the mouth, chew and swallow. Otherwise know as what these fat ****s are stuffing in their jabber ****ing jaws! Don't stop now, Clyde, I think you are on another roll!)
    Center spokesman Jeff Cronin said Kellogg contacted the plaintiffs shortly thereafter and began negotiating the new standards, so the lawsuit was not filed and will not be filed.
    "We are pleased to work collaboratively with industry and advocacy groups to unveil these standards," said David Mackay, Kellogg's CEO. "We feel the Kellogg Nutrient Criteria set a new standard for responsibility in the industry." (Paraphased: we didn't want to get sued because we are pussies)
    With 2006 sales of almost $11 billion, Kellogg is not only the No. 1 cereal-maker but also a leading producer of snack foods. Its brands include Kellogg's, Keebler, Pop-Tarts, Eggo, Cheez-It, Rice Krispies and Famous Amos.
    Globally, 50 percent of the products Kellogg markets to children (Parents still have to buy this shit and need to get a spine. "No Johnny, this shit will kill you and make you fat. If you don't quit your whining, I am going to slap your ass with a wooden spoon!) do not meet the criteria, said Mark Baynes, Kellogg's chief marketing officer. A third of the cereals it markets to children in the U.S. fall outside standards.
    Pop-Tarts and Froot Loops don't meet the criteria, though most cereals fall inside the calorie guideline, Baynes said. Meeting the sugar and sodium standards could be the most challenging.
    Kellogg also announced that it will continue to refrain from advertising to children under age 6, and will not in the future:
    _Advertise to children any foods in schools and preschools that include kids under age 12.
    _Sponsor placement of any of its products in any medium primarily directed at kids under age 12.
    _Use branded toys connected to any foods that do not meet the nutrition standards.
    _Use licensed characters on mass-media ads directed primarily to kids under 12 or on the front labels of food packages unless they meet the standards.
    The advertising agreement does not apply to marketing characters Kellogg owns, like Tony the Tiger, but it does apply to characters the food company licenses, like the cartoon figure Shrek, said Susan Linn, co-founder of the Campaign For A Commercial-Free Childhood.
    She said Kellogg was the first food company to agree to restrict advertising using licensed media characters like Shrek.
    "These characters play an incredibly important role in children's lives. Kids see them every day; they have toys of them," Linn said. "The media characters are much more powerful (than company-owned characters like Tony the Tiger). The food companies want to keep using them because they sell a lot of food; kids really respond to them."
    Earlier this month, a Federal Trade Commission study found that half the ads for junk food, sugary cereals and soft drinks are on children's programs, double the percentage 30 years ago. Children between ages 2 and 11 saw approximately 5,500 food ads on television in 2004, half of them on kids' shows with audiences of 50 percent children or greater.
    American companies spend about $15 billion a year marketing and advertising to children under age 12, the Institute of Medicine said last year when it warned that one-third of American children are obese or at risk for becoming obese.
    In response, Kellogg and McDonald's Corp. joined eight other major food and drink companies last November in an industry-sponsored pledge to promote more healthy foods and exercise in their child-oriented advertising. A year earlier, Kraft Foods Inc. had promised to curb ads to young children for snack foods, including Oreos and Kool-Aid.

    I am about to go totally ****ing ballistic. I am steamed up.
  2. BAT1

    BAT1 Cowboys know no fear

    Alot of these companies are using genetically modified grains. This is linked to obesity. General foods does.
  3. Clyde

    Clyde Jet Set Tourer Administrator Founding Member

    My point is: Don't buy their shit then and when their sales go down they will change.
  4. kckndrgn

    kckndrgn Monkey+++ Moderator Emeritus Founding Member

    I agree with you Clyde.

    People sould read the ingredients instead of relying on what the company puts on their box or adverts. For example even though that package of cookies you bought says "no trans fats", if you look at the serving size, it's one or two cookies AND THERE IS STILL TRANS FAT IN IT. And the .gov lets them do this, because if there is less than .5grams of trans fat per serving you can label the product as "No Trans Fats". Just like "Fat Free", "Sugar Free", etc.

    Since I have started reading labels and buying as much of my food product without "enriched" parts and without "High Fructos Cornsyrup" my health is MUCH better

    edited to add:
    I really don't care who they "market" to. If the kids are telling the parents what to get for food, then there is a serious parenting problem going on.
  5. Clyde

    Clyde Jet Set Tourer Administrator Founding Member

    EXACTOMUNDO! How about you turn the TV off and educate your children with books rather than Sesame Street (should be rename to Socialist Street!)
  6. kckndrgn

    kckndrgn Monkey+++ Moderator Emeritus Founding Member

    Not only dust off the books but get a decent pair of walking shoes for the each member of the family and start going on family walks in the neighborhood. Your hood is in a "bad neighborhood" well then go to a park or just somewhere better.

    Turn off the Playstation, Nintento, etc. and put the bag of chips down. Start a container garden on your porch. Learn and teach the kids how to grow food, harvest it and cook it. No hormones, no drugs, no additives.... you get the idea.

    Clyde, I also like your sig line. Less than 12 months and, Lord willin', my family will be out of debt, except the house.
  7. Tracy

    Tracy Insatiably Curious Moderator Founding Member

    My hat's off to you!

    I assume you've seen Kellogg's new Frosted Flakes and Froot Loops with 1/3 Less Sugar.:rolleyes: Good grief!
  8. Clyde

    Clyde Jet Set Tourer Administrator Founding Member

    Like I really want to eat fruit loops with less sugar? I like em the way they are. Twice a year we buy a box of Lucky Charms, Apple Jacks, Fuit Loops or Frosted Flakes. It is a special treat for the kids and well, I am a kid, too, so I get to try them.

    Socialists suck.
  9. kckndrgn

    kckndrgn Monkey+++ Moderator Emeritus Founding Member

    Only 1/3 less sugar until the kiddos add another few tablespoons with their cereal in the morning.

    Yeah, we don't have too many bags/boxes of cereal around here, most of them have HFC and that is one thing that I really try to limit in this house.
survivalmonkey SSL seal warrant canary