1. The Topic of the Month for October is "Make this the Perfect Bugout Location". Please join the discussion in the TOTM forum.

Lakin says "see you incourt"

Discussion in 'Freedom and Liberty' started by Tango3, Jun 11, 2010.

  1. Tango3

    Tango3 Aimless wanderer


    [​IMG] <!---- CENTER ----->
    <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><script type="text/javascript"> GA_googleFillSlot("WND_NWS_C0100"); </script><script src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?correlator=1276306671391&output=json_html&callback=GA_googleSetAdContentsBySlotForSync&impl=s&a2ids=%2CBWYYA%2CBeDgg%2CBX01g%2CB2B9g&cids=%2CQP_h9w%2CPkioao%2COpYb8Q%2CTSbkuY&eid=31865000&client=ca-pub-9952085791529017&slotname=WND_NWS_C0100&page_slots=WND_NWS__FLOAT%2CWND_NWS__SKY_%2CWND_NWS_L0100%2CWND_NWS_L0201%2CWND_NWS_L0300%2CWND_NWS_C0100&cookie=ID%3Da3027b0779d4f4dc%3AT%3D1272247635%3AS%3DALNI_MYJg9H_97o0zYhZyaQ6YvFWdFDX8w&ga_vid=1416131143.1272247676&ga_sid=1276306603&ga_hid=1009773085&ga_fc=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wnd.com%2Findex.php%3Ffa%3DPAGE.view%26pageId%3D165093&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.survivalmonkey.com%2Fforum%2Fnewthread.php%3Fdo%3Dpostthread%26f%3D13&lmt=1276268170&dt=1276306673680&cc=33&biw=1639&bih=779&ifi=6&u_tz=-420&u_his=1&u_java=true&u_h=1050&u_w=1680&u_ah=1020&u_aw=1680&u_cd=24&u_nplug=22&u_nmime=116&flash=10.0.32"></script> <iframe style="border: 0pt none;" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" name="google_ads_iframe_WND_NWS_C0100" id="google_ads_iframe_WND_NWS_C0100" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="60" width="468"></iframe>
    <script>GA_googleCreateDomIframe('google_ads_div_WND_NWS_C0100' ,'WND_NWS_C0100');</script>
    <!-- writer and photo option --> <hr noshade="noshade" size="1"> <!-- leadin graphic -->[​IMG] <hr noshade="noshade" size="1"> <!-- standing head --> [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]BORN IN THE USA?[/SIZE][/FONT]
    <!-- head --> [FONT=Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Officer to Army: See you in court

    [/FONT] <!-- deck --> [FONT=Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Waives initial hearing on charges of failing to obey chain of command

    [/FONT] <hr size="1"> [SIZE=-1]Posted: June 11, 2010
    12:15 am Eastern

    [/SIZE] [FONT=Palatino, Times New Roman, Georgia, Times, serif]By BOB Unruh[/FONT]
    <!-- copyright --> [SIZE=-1] © 2010 WorldNetDaily [/SIZE]

    <!-- bodytext --> <!--INFOLINKS_ON--> <script language="javascript"> function legalChars(input,fieldName){ var tfld = input.value.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/, ''); // value of field with whitespace trimmed off var illegalChars= /[\(\)\<\>\,\;\:\"\[\]]/ ; if (tfld.match(illegalChars)) { alert('Please enter valid characters in your '+fieldName+'.'); input.focus(); return false; } return true; } function mandatoryText(input,fieldName){ if(input.value == '' || input == null){ alert('Please enter your '+fieldName+'.'); input.focus(); return false; } else { return true; } } function validEmail(field,fieldName) { with (field) { apos=value.indexOf("@"); dotpos=value.lastIndexOf("."); if (apos<1||dotpos-apos<2) { alert('Please enter a valid '+fieldName+'.'); return false; } } var emailFilter = /^[^@]+@[^@.]+\.[^@]*\w\w$/ ; if (!emailFilter.test(field.value)) { //test email for illegal characters alert('Please enter well-formed '+fieldName+'.'); input.focus(); return false; } return true; } function checkSignup(newsletterCheckbox,thisNewsletter) { var inputs = document.emvForm.getElementsByTagName('input'); for (var i=0; i < inputs.length; i++) { if (inputs.getAttribute('type') == 'hidden') { if (newsletterCheckbox.checked == true) { if (inputs.value == '') {inputs.value = 'X';} } else { if (inputs.value == 'X') {inputs.value = '';} } if (inputs.name == thisNewsletter.name) {inputs.value = 'X';} } } } function validForm(){ if(!mandatoryText(document.getElementById('FIRSTNAME_FIELD'), 'First Name')) return; if(!legalChars(document.getElementById('FIRSTNAME_FIELD'), 'First Name')) return; if(!mandatoryText(document.getElementById('LASTNAME_FIELD'), 'Last Name')) return; if(!legalChars(document.getElementById('LASTNAME_FIELD'), 'Last Name')) return; if(!validEmail(document.getElementById('EMAIL_FIELD'), 'Email')) return; if(!legalChars(document.getElementById('POSTAL_CODE_FIELD'), 'Postal Code')) return; document.getElementById('emvForm').submit(); } </script> <table align="right" border="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td width="218">[​IMG]
    Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> An Army officer who invited his own court-martial to resolve for the nation questions about Barack Obama's eligibility to be president has waived a preliminary hearing in his case.
    Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who refused orders from a chain of command led by Obama, also today released a new video explaining why documentation needs to be released by Obama that could confirm that he qualifies to be president under the Constitution's demand that the office by held only by a "natural born citizen."
    Lakin was scheduled for an Article 32 military hearing tomorrow, the equivalent of a civilian preliminary hearing in a court case. But Daniel J. Driscoll, an Army hearing officer, had banned Lakin from bringing in evidence about Obama's birth as well as testimony from Hawaii officials who may have information on the subject.
    "In my view our constitutional jurisprudence allows Congress alone, and not a military judicial body, to put the president's credentials on trial," Driscoll wrote in a memorandum determining what evidence the defense for Lakin would have been allowed.
    But in a new video, Lakin said the issue is important:
    Officer to Army: See you in court
  2. Tango3

    Tango3 Aimless wanderer

    And here's a great post from the thread where I ifirst saw the above: from Clairewolfes "mental militia": posted in in a withering hailstorm of liberal democrat "he aint legal and it don't matter replies":

    I've thought it interesting that some nonstatists can be so well-versed in various philosophies and so obtuse at the same time; we all know that the reason for a natural-born President is one of loyalty, geographical loyalty being somewhat of an indicator of ideological loyalty, at least historically. Whether that necessarily bears out as a valid one is on a case by case basis.

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were not born here but I would not have voted that the latter move into the White House, not even on a bet. Similarly, Arlen Specter WAS born here, but given his bona fides I would rather have Roger Rabbit in the Oval Office.

    The question for me in this context is: do I want the existing government, as out of control as it already is, as treasonous to its own binding legal structure as it is, to now send its Justice Dept into the Federal court system to tell that court that the question of eligibility by citizenship is NONE OF THE COURT'S BUSINESS, that the court has no authority?

    That's what happened when the DoJ went into court and argued jurisdictional authority, saying that Congress had already decided the question and that even, ahem, the EXECUTIVE branch had more authority to decide the question than the court (??!!). Which effectively killed the ability of the court system to have any binding effect on the arguing parties if one is the Power Elite, a requirement even in an essentially gov-less world. Also, the DoJ answered the question of eligibility in so doing, otherwise their argument would have been radically different and much simpler, i.e. one truly valid document chain showing his citizenship to be real, which of course they refused to do.

    So the big thing for me is this: the government we had, or thought we had, has just been OPENLY taken into custody by the likes of Kissinger and Paul Wolfowitz, and as illegimate as it was, it just got way worse, and the people in the geographical space 'governed' by it have all been told to **** off by those 'in charge'. This is not a step in the direction of real human evolution but a step back to feudalistic, royalistic tyranny, and to me it's a very important one in its implications, and the , um, minarchist idealism of some does not negate that fact in any way, especially since we've just stepped even further away from that admittedly high ideal than we even were before.

    All of which tells me that Blueghost is right: It's later than we think..............much later.


    ( paragraph split up for readibility by me "t3")

    <table style="table-layout: fixed;" border="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr> <td colspan="2" class="smalltext" align="left" width="100%">
    </td> </tr><tr> </tr></tbody></table>
  3. fortunateson

    fortunateson I hate Illinois Nazis!

    Ah - A little dense here...
    Why is he being court martialed? Is it because of his pursuit of a BC, or incidental to his quest?

    While this whole BC thing is interesting and no-doubt shows that we have a Manchurian candidate in the White House, I think it will ultimately be a dead-end.

    My BC looks like a crumbled up bad negative photocopy on old creased paper - and everyone accepts it as valid.
    How hard will it be for him to come up with something similar and pay off a bunch of witnesses?
    Admittedly, I'm not following this drama too closely. Is there more to this that he can't gloss over?
  4. Tango3

    Tango3 Aimless wanderer

    "Missing a movement" felony offense under the UCMJ. He was given orders to deploy and he questioned obummers standing as commander in chief to issue those orders. He is giving up his carreer, retirement, and putting himself in jeopardy of a prison term at hard labor to force this issue into court where he will have the power of "discovery" to provide for his defense. Last Army Officer tried this same tactic; the Army merely recinded his deployment orders.and the case was dismissed. The circumstantial evidence of a legal problem sitting in the white house just reeks. It matters that much. This officer is a real selfless hero Patriot putting his neck on the line doing this to protect the constitution of our country.Whenever the question comes up judges find "no standing" to go to trial or other technicalities that don't answer the question .Find me one bit of documentation of obama's history(?) everything is sealed and protected by one court or another. It stinks: like a new jersey saltmarsh at low tide..
  5. fortunateson

    fortunateson I hate Illinois Nazis!

    Thanks for the edu-ma-cation Tango.
    I agree. Very selfless and an incredibly smart - though risky way to force Obama's hand. He either has to dance or let it go.

    Now if he's successful, and 10,000 men join his ranks, big O has a real problem on his hands. THAT would be interesting. Though I don't think he'd have it dismissed or say "you got me, I was'nt born here. " More likely a fake BC and paid off witnesses, revealing the ugly tyrant that really reside on Penn ave.
    Lot's of luck recruiting new soldiers under those conditions.
  6. Brokor

    Brokor Live Free or Cry Moderator Site Supporter+++ Founding Member

    He is trying to form a crucible to make the truth come out -and we can already see how the rats are trying to scramble for an excuse not to bring evidence to trial by claiming "Congress" only has the exclusive privilege to hear evidence regarding the President. The interesting part is that this General cannot be proven guilty unless that is exactly what occurs. He's a three-star. Not stupid. I tip my hat.

    Most likely, this will all be pushed aside and swept under the blanket -no matter the outcome.
  7. Tango3

    Tango3 Aimless wanderer

    Perhaps he's the "anti-christ" born of wolves on the African veld...(??) no paperwork...
  8. tacmotusn

    tacmotusn Mosquito Sailor

    If only he would grow visible undeniable horns I would take his head for a trophy. Unfortunately the sneaky bastard walks among us concealing his true birth thus staying my hand. He has nothing to fear from me except the truth at this point.
  9. Tango3

    Tango3 Aimless wanderer

    De tribal witch doctor threw back the ratty blanket covering the doorway of the mud hut uttered the ancient words:"mokele' click umbembe'" and any visible sign of horns were forever removed. [freedom]
  10. fortunateson

    fortunateson I hate Illinois Nazis!

    WHAT is that a picture of and WHERE did you find it !?!
  11. tacmotusn

    tacmotusn Mosquito Sailor

    Obama as a young lad, sucking up to Soros....[lolol]
  12. Suerto

    Suerto Monkey+

    3 star generals are typically as well versed and connected in politics as any politician, I would see this as a start to drawing a line in the sand.. Similiarly to how the civil war began, politicians began "rabble rousing" the masses to see the popular feel, meanwhile discussions were held with military "sons of the south" to see if the politicians would have any backers for a forceful seccession. If this general is persuing this, rest assured, he's had discussions with others of powerful standings to weigh his battle plan..

    should prove to be interesting..
  13. tacmotusn

    tacmotusn Mosquito Sailor

    Where did you get the 3 star general idea.....? Is this guy not a Lt. Colonel...? Bravo to him for his guts and convictions, and hope for his success, although like others I believe the slimy bastards in Washington will try to escape releasing the truth.
  14. Suerto

    Suerto Monkey+

    my mistake.. I was thinking about something else at the time while writing, Lt. Colonel's have connections as well, was my point.. (Ollie North was a lowly Colonel during the Iran/contra affair if I recall.. someone correct me if I'm wrong)

    Not like he's an enlisted grunt just doing it on his own, I would imagine he has done some investigating into his options, possibilities, and drawbacks..
  15. Tango3

    Tango3 Aimless wanderer

    Why Roaming the interwebs of course...:rolleyes:

    what is it? Some young african GETTING A DRINK I THINK[yukface](
    Probably and ad picture for:" big bessie water filters"...:)
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary