1. The Topic of the Month for October is "Make this the Perfect Bugout Location". Please join the discussion in the TOTM forum.

North Korea set to destroy reactor cooling tower

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Quigley_Sharps, Jun 27, 2008.

  1. Quigley_Sharps

    Quigley_Sharps The Badministrator Administrator Founding Member

    SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea is set to blow up the cooling tower at its nuclear plant on Friday, a symbolic move to show its commitment to a disarmament deal a day after it handed over a long-delayed account of its nuclear program.

    Global powers still need to verify the claims Pyongyang made in its atomic inventory and experts say the dramatic event will leave unresolved questions about the North's declaration, such as accounting for its nuclear weaponry.

    But shortly after North Korea handed over the list on Thursday, the United States responded by saying it would take the state it once branded as being part of "an axis of evil" off of its terrorism blacklist and ease some sanctions.

    The secretive North has invited in five foreign media outlets to witness the destruction of the tower, which is connected to its Soviet-era reactor. It is expected to come down in the afternoon local time.

    Steam coming from the tower in spy satellite photographs has been the most visible signs of operation at the facility, capable of producing arms-grade plutonium.

    "The problem is that they always feel that they can continue to game the system and appear to keep the window open -- actions like blowing up cooling towers on TV for propaganda effect that I'm not sure have much practical effect," said Derek Mitchell, Asia expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    U.S. President George W. Bush cautiously welcomed the declaration but warned North Korea, which tested a nuclear device in October 2006, that it faced "consequences" if it did not fully disclose its operations and continue to dismantle its nuclear programs.

    Responding to an unusual opening by the secretive communist state, Bush took a step toward removing North Korea from a U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism and issued a proclamation lifting some sanctions under the Trading with the Enemy Act.


    Once it is removed from the lists, North Korea will be able to better tap into international finance.

    Due to the small size of North Korea's rickety economy, any increases in investment and trade could have major effects, experts said, but added increased revenue would likely make its way to Pyongyang's leaders and further solidify their rule.

    U.S. officials acknowledged that the North Korean declaration, which came six months after a December deadline, fell short of answering all concerns about Pyongyang's atomic ambitions, especially on past nuclear proliferation activities.

    Stephen Hadley, Bush's national security adviser, said the statement revealed the amount of plutonium North Korea had produced but did not detail its nuclear arsenal.

    But he said U.S. experts could "do the math" and that issue would be discussed in a further phase of the so called six-party talks.

    Under a deal North Korea struck with China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States, Pyongyang was required to start taking apart its Yongbyon nuclear plant and provide the nuclear list by the end of 2007.

    U.S. and South Korean officials said North Korea has taken most of the steps to put the Yongbyon facility -- that includes the reactor, a plant to make nuclear fuel and another to turn spent fuel into plutonium -- out of business for at least a year.

    "The key issue here is of course verification and what type of an inspection regime the North Koreans agree to," said Lee Chung-min, professor of international relations at Yonsei University in Seoul.

    "Once we come down to the nitty gritty of inspections, they will basically try to prolong the process as long as possible, without giving up nuclear weapons."

    (Additional reporting by Paul Eckert, Matt Spetalnick and Jeremy Pelofsky in Washington; Editing by Nick Macfie and David Fox)
  2. Quigley_Sharps

    Quigley_Sharps The Badministrator Administrator Founding Member

    Might be another victory for the Bush Camp???
  3. CBMS

    CBMS Looking for a safe place

    lol no, the delay was so that they could build a second reactor underground and out of view
  4. ghrit

    ghrit Ambulatory anachronism Administrator Founding Member

    Soviet style reactor probably means one like Chernobyl. Primitive design with recognized safety issues. Even NoKor has to recognize that, and has chosen to shut 'er down. Or, maybe they recognize that cooling towers, while a seriously good way to provide cooling, leave a most excellent target signature.
survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary