Report: U.S. Gave Green Light For Taliban Prison Attack Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet Monday, June 16, 2008 <table align="right" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="366"> <tbody><tr> <td height="16"></td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="16"> </td> <td width="350"></td> </tr> <tr> <td height="8"> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="16"> </td> <td class="photo-caption" align="left" valign="top" width="350">Without an enemy to fight, there would be no justification for a continued U.S. and NATO presence in Afghanistan. There would be no more weapons sales contracts and no more rebuilding contracts for Halliburton.</td> </tr> <tr> <td height="8"> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody></table> Reports out of the Middle East indicate that U.S. forces gave the green light for the Taliban to attack a government prison in Kandahar this past Friday and stood idly by while Taliban fighters violently freed more than 1000 inmates. "Experts in regional affairs believe that Taliban militants attacked the Kandahar prison with the green light from US forces," reports Press TV. "They say it is questionable - how could the militants dare attack the prison with US-led troops stationed just northeast of the jail?" "The sources also noted that although clashes between Afghan security forces and the militants lasted for several hours, US-led troops did not intervene." "Ordinary people share the idea, asking how is it possible that hundreds of militants could attack a government prison, detonating more than 800 kilograms of explosives and foreign forces show no reaction." Why would U.S. forces stand idly by while 600 hundred Taliban fighters were freed? The report notes that "Afghans are tired of war and that only a few illiterate people, called Taliban, are fighting foreign forces." Without an enemy to fight, there would be no justification for a continued U.S. and NATO presence in Afghanistan. There would be no more weapons sales contracts and no more rebuilding contracts for Halliburton. Remember, this miraculous prison break occurred just days before Gordon Brown agreed to send hundreds more British troops into Afghanistan to put the British presence there at an all time high. The necessity for continued violence in Afghanistan exists just like it does in Iraq, for the pretext of justifying an endless military occupation and the opportunity to build military bases that will be used as launch pads for future wars, as is now being discussed for Iraq. As we have highlighted in the past, links between Taliban leadership and the U.S. military-industrial complex are documented. As Seymour Hersh reported in January 2002, at the height of the war in Afghanistan, hundreds of Taliban fighters "accidentally" ended up on U.S. organized special safety corridor airlifts right before the fall of Kunduz. The Taliban itself was a creation of the CIA having been set up and bankrolled by the U.S. in tandem with Pakistan’s ISI. “In the 1980s, the CIA provided some $5 billion in military aid for Islamic fundamentalist rebels fighting the Soviet occupation in Afghanistan, but scaled down operations after Moscow pulled out in 1989. However, Selig Harrison of the DC-based Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars recently told a conference in London that the CIA created the Taliban “monster” by providing some $3 billion for the ultra-fundamentalist militia in their 1994-6 drive to power," reported the Times of India. http://www.infowars.com/?p=2708 ------- Hmm.... Seems like they need to encourage chaos to justify prolonged occupation in that region to me.