Discussion in 'General Survival and Preparedness' started by UGRev, Jan 1, 2012.
I'm Voting For Ron Paul
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but Ron Paul will NOT win the nomination. He is way to far out on security on foreign policy for the average Repb. On the other had as he has done in the past, he will most likely once again run as an independent, which will only result in splitting the vote on the repb ticket. And as before when he helped Clinton be elected, he will manage to get O Great one re-elected. And if you think that we can take another 4 years of that loonie you better think again.
O will then have nothing to lose and will pull out all the stops and go for his loonie very far left agenda. He will no longer be worried about being re elected and therefore losing his enormas vacation budget or links fees.
Since Dr Paul is the only candidate who has any real concern for the security of our nation and the constitution I swore to protect, he will most certainly get my vote.
It is probable he will not win because the sheep have been far too well conditioned into believing that breaking the bank and alienating the rest of the world by interfering in every part of the world somehow "protects" us and that the constitution is to be ignored when it gets in the way of what the corporations want...but that will not encourage me to vote for which one will take away those few remaining rights.
I'll cast my vote for the honest one and continue to prepare for the end that the others will merely hasten.
I like everything about Paul, But he's anti-isreal and his foreign policy suck the big one. He will not win. I still feel Rick S. would be the best bet.
He's anti-Israel? That's funny, because the Israel lobby in the US seems to think that but the chief of the Mossad agree with Dr. Paul that the US should get out of Israel's business and give them the respect to make their own choices like a free country rather than operating their country as a wholly-owned subsidiary
And Dr. Paul's "foreign policy suck" as you so ignorantly put it, is the only thing that may save this country.
About the only thing you are correct about is that he will not win...due to the brainwashed morons who will continue to vote for liberal fools like Romney, Gingrich, Santorum and Obama...then expect anything to change other than keeping on getting worse.
Sorry if I offend you (not really this time, I no longer give a *hit), but I am reaching a point where it makes me sick that I killed a whole bunch of innocent people thinking I was defending the constitution when the real enemies are the traitorous politicians and those who spout their crap for them. The time for choosing between traitors is about over.
Horse ****. He believes that if stop subsidizing Israel that they would be able to grow faster and be stronger than they are now. The only reason we keep giving them money is to slow them down. He wants Israel to be their own masters.. how is that, in any way, shape or form , anti-Israel?
I swear to god... so many people are just regurgitating talking points..
1. he's anti-Israel
2. he's a joo hater
3. he's a racist
4. he is weak on defense.
Not a single one of them has been proven to be true.
I'm voting Ron Paul.
Why would he not win? He's first or second in the polls, he'll bring in voters from other parties. He's got the best chance of beating Obama. This was a big deal for you Republicans in the past, PAUL IS THE ONLY VETERAN!
The problem is that too many people listen to the news like it's the truth. The news says he won't win and that he is crazy, and thus it MUST be true. LIES and PROPAGANDA! The best thing you can do for a free mind is stop watching the tube. THEY choose what truth you get, it's not the other way around when you turn on the TV. Turn on the TV and join the flock of sheep.
I think you got me wrong i like Ron Paul. I don;t think we should be in every war and i think Israel should stand on her own feet, The way he comes across though is that he won't support them if they decide to take out Iran. He won't do preemptive strike on Iran if they got a nuke. I don't think we need to be the world police but i think if noone else will step up and do the dirty work we should. I'm all for smaller government and i think Paul would deliver his deliver is just clown crazy.
3rd in the caucus, and yes the news says he is crazy. Watch with your own eyes he comes across as a bulb 1/2 burned out. His son would be great but he's just not the one. There really is no perfect candidate this time.
Keep in mind almost all politicians lie their butts off. No way can you disagree with that. So promises mean nothing. Now look at past performances. Who stands out head and shoulders above the rest in the most areas we all agree on? Not every item, but the most. We are not talking promises here, we are talking actual performance. Ron Paul stands head and shoulders above all the rest for actually doing what he says. And, in doing what most all of us say we want. Check it out yourself. Make a list of what you believe in and check them all out.
It is no difference with Obummer in his presidential campaign 2008, and Republicans today. His prior votes and actions said one thing. He campaigned saying something else altogther. then he even said things that fully contradicted what he had campaigned for at the last campaign stop. One smooth talking lying SOB. The media ignored it.
I could just ask you, Who do you support for president? If it were anyone but Ron Paul, I am pretty sure I can convince you he or she is not to be trusted. ..... just saying.
The problem is, that this country needs to step back and let someone else "do the dirty work", we have been doing the dirty job for far too long.
let someone else handle that headache. So what if Iran gets a nuke? They would only use it once and then they would be a glass parking lot. i dont believe in this "preemtive" crap.
There is never a perfect canidate. Ron Paul is the best bet though....
Separate names with a comma.