Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Quigley_Sharps, Jan 11, 2013.
An excellent example of how to handle a gun control debate.
None of the weapons used were assault rifles. There were semi-automatic. WHY CAN'T PEOPLE GET THIS THROUGH THEIR FUCKING HEADS!!
Piers would not know the truth if it bit him.
55 or 62 gr he might.
Standing on the grave's of dead children...WOW..That hit home to Choupic Morgan...I'm glad...
Piers Morgan is an idiot. He gives the guy his opinion, doesn't let him say what it is, and then says "your opinion is crystal clear" when he wouldn't even let him get it out. Hell yeah our government is going tyrannical. Pretending like that isn't happening makes it look like YOU Piers are on their side and in cahoots with them. It makes you look like the tool that you are. How can this English moron come here and have a talk show and try to tell us Americans how things should be here? Do we really want to leave our destiny as a country in the hands of foreign interests? Is there no one at the helm?
Shapiro is not the kind of guy I would choose to debate this with Piers.
Alex Jones is not the guy I would want to have debate this with Piers.
There's only one who can bring it like it needs to be brought...Ted Nugent.
SUCK ON IT!
Bring it Ted!!
Aww yeah, that is what I"M talking about!!! It seems pretty obvious that Piers morgan is demonizing guns in a deliberate attempt.
Demagogue - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Demagogue - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
While we're at it:
They keep talking about Lanza and how many guns they had but they fail to mention that the dad was in the CIA before he died. An alleged good guy who would have guns regardless of all these semantics.
Separate names with a comma.