1. The Topic of the Month for October is "Make this the Perfect Bugout Location". Please join the discussion in the TOTM forum.

U.S. Lacks Unified Emergency Radio System

Discussion in 'General Survival and Preparedness' started by ghostrider, Sep 14, 2005.

  1. ghostrider

    ghostrider Resident Poltergeist Founding Member

    U.S. Lacks Unified Emergency Radio System By MATTHEW FORDAHL and BRUCE MEYERSON, AP Technology Writers
    Tue Sep 13, 9:53 PM ET

    After surviving Hurricane Katrina's initial blow, the radio communications system for the New Orleans police and fire departments dissolved as its radio towers lost their backup power generators in the ensuing flood.

    Some of the equipment could have been brought back up quickly, except that technicians were blocked from entering the submerged city for three days by state troopers who were themselves struggling with an overwhelmed radio system from a different manufacturer.

    "I didn't get a chance to plead my case," said Jan Edwards, service manager for the New Orleans radio system's maker, Tyco International Ltd. subsidiary M/A-Com Inc.

    While Edwards and his team were detained on its outskirts, emergency workers inside the city were mostly limited to a handful of CB-like "mutual aid" radio channels, which were quickly overwhelmed.

    Four years after the 2001 terror attacks exposed the need for more robust, interconnected communications during such calamities, with nearly a billion dollars appropriated by Congress for the task last year, the United States still lacks uniform systems that can keep all emergency responders in touch.

    "We're no better off than we were then," Louisiana state Sen. Robert Barham said last week.

    With regular phone and cellular service knocked out in Katrina's wake — the New Orleans mayor's office had to cobble together an Internet phone link with the outside world — first responders were simply unable to share essential information.

    Federal emergency management officials claim they didn't know for days about thousands of people camped out, thirsty and hungry, at the New Orleans convention center. Rescuers in helicopters couldn't talk to crews patrolling in boats. National guard commanders in Mississippi had to use runners to relay orders.

    On Tuesday, Democrats on Capital Hill urged Congress to devote $5 billion a year to upgrading communications equipment for the nation's first-responders. Sen. Mary Landrieu (news, bio, voting record), D-La., said the hurricane exposed a "totally failed communication system."

    But many experts say doling out federal monies is far from enough. Some advocate creating a national wireless data network — with its own dedicated emergency frequencies — that police, firefighters and all other responders could plug into immediately after a catastrophe.

    Such a system wouldn't be immune to damage but could be quickly repaired, says one of its advocates, Reed Hundt, who chaired the Federal Communications Commission from 1993-97.

    "You drive the new antenna in on the back of a truck or you carry them in on choppers if they're knocked out or drowned and you can get your network back up in hours," he said in an interview.

    Hundt says he's suggested such a project, but the White House has ignored it. The Department of Homeland Security did not return phone calls seeking comment on the issue.

    Since 2001, the federal government has given $8.6 billion to states for equipment, first responder training and disaster exercises. Last year, DHS gave the states $2.1 billion, of which $925 million was spent on or earmarked for communications equipment upgrades.

    The department, however, does not tell states what to buy, though it stresses that any system deployed in the field should be able talk to another agency's system, known as "interoperability" in industry parlance.

    Complaints of difficulties in communicating across agencies have been frequent after major disasters — including the Oklahoma City bombing of 1995, the 2001 terror attacks and the southern California fires of 2003.

    Other reasons emergency responders have trouble talking to each other include turf wars among agencies and interference from cell phones on some frequencies.

    But one of the biggest hurdles is time and money, said Adrienne Dimopoulos, spokeswoman for Motorola Inc., a longtime public safety radio supplier. "It takes a long time to design them, it takes a long time to implement them. They're costly," she said.

    New Orleans bought the M/A-Com system in 1992. Four years later, Louisiana State Police bought its statewide system from Motorola Inc. The two systems have occasionally been bridged to integrate communications during major, planned events such as the 2002 Super Bowl.

    The statewide system did stay up after Katrina hit on Aug. 29, while New Orleans' was off the air just a few hours later.

    In addition to generators disabled by floodwaters, the city network's primary tower, located atop the Energy Center building, was knocked out when debris struck a radiator, springing a leak.

    That forced local agencies to communicate over a handful of "mutual aid" channels.

    "There might be two or three channels for the area, and there are 4,000 people trying to talk," said Chuck Shaughnessy, M/A-Com vice president of operations. "It tries to be controlled chaos, but it's usually not very controlled."

    According to documents posted on the Louisiana State Police Web site, officials were long cognizant of the interoperability problem with New Orleans' police and fire departments and formed committees to come up with a "totally interoperable" system. Planning had barely progressed, however, when Katrina hit.

    But system compatibilities in emergency communications alone cannot fairly be blamed for delays in rescuing the flooded or getting food or evacuation to stranded refugees.

    The much-criticized federal response to Katrina shows that even the latest equipment is no guarantee of smooth communications, said John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org.

    "They had all the radios in the world. They had complete interoperability," Pike said of federal emergency officials. "That was not a hardware problem. That was a people and procedure problem."

  2. melbo

    melbo Hunter Gatherer Administrator Founding Member

    Yup, even are communications are gettting to reliant on convenience
  3. ricdoug

    ricdoug Monkey+++

    Attached Files:

  4. yonder

    yonder No Despot's Servant

    Part of this comes as a result of first responders trying to work around the amateur radio service instead of hand-in-hand with the service.

    The Red Cross understands the services provided and supplied our club with special radio gear to communicate with their workers during local/regional relief efforts. Only a couple of cops "get it" and they are mostly not decision makers. All of these bigwigs are trying to come up with some silver bullet radio system to get EVERYONE on and no matter what they do, they are not trained for dealing with a high volume of traffic on the radio and technology is not going to fix that.

    The amateur radio service trains year-round for disasters and moving emergency traffic efficiently. That's what we're here for.
  5. ricdoug

    ricdoug Monkey+++

survivalmonkey SSL seal        survivalmonkey.com warrant canary